Seattle Sounders v Portland Timbers

Would Mix Diskerud have been worth a Designated Player slot? Merritt Paulson has thoughts

2 Comments

This isn’t going to come as a shock to anybody who follows me on Twitter, but I’m a big fan of Portland owner Merritt Paulson. Or better put, I’m a big fan of the way he goes about his business (I don’t know the guy personally). Via his always active Twitter account, he’s constantly connected to the Portland faithful, and his honest (sometimes brutally honest) way of interacting with followers provides a refreshing alternative to the sterile no-speak communications departments are hired to churn out.

Organizations are always talking about how to keep The Conversation going (as if “The Conversation” was a lead in to The Closer that TNT was trying to bleed another season out of), but you don’t do that through sunshine and happiness press releases. You do it by being up front and honest, an approach so rare its elicits a mild, unspoken shock from the fan base. That’s why Paulson’s social media presence polarizes, dividing people between those that get it and those nostalgic for fax machines and teletype. it’s not exactly something out of MLS 1.0’s instruction manual.

The Best Soccer Show podcast caught some of Paulson’s brutal honesty yesterday, their ranging interview covering three topics I found particularly interesting:

1. U.S. Soccer will not be playing a Hex match at Jeld-Wen – We suspected it. Paulson confirmed it. Portland has taken a stand on laying temporary sod on top of their FieldTurf surface. U.S. Soccer has taken a stand on giving them a qualifier. CONCACAF may not have a problem with it. USSF does.

I think it’s ridiculous, but I’ve covered that ground before. Lumping all turf fields together is like lumping all natural surfaces together. As Paulson concedes in the interview, grass would be preferable, but is that enough to take Jeld-Wen off the list entirely? As Dan Gargan implied, perhaps it is, but when turf antagonists Thierry Henry and David Beckham have no problem with Portland (as Paulson details in the interview), maybe others should re-think their stances, too?

2. Cascadia Cup controversy – Paulson didn’t comment on it directly. He said he’d been asked not to, but he did predict the lingering dispute between Major League Soccer and Pacific Northwest supporters groups will be resolved amicably. Breaking out my Official Read Between the MLS Lines Handbook, it sounds like the league is committed to working with, not stonewalling, supporters.

3. Timbers, league weren’t sold on Diskerud as a Designated Player – This was by far the most interesting tidbit from the interview. When asked why Portland’s negotiations with U.S. international Mix Diskerud broke down, Paulson said the deal that fell apart at the last-minute wasn’t completed because Diskerud would have had to be made a Designated Player.

That shouldn’t be a surprise given Diskerud’s earning potential in Europe. What’s surprising is Portland seemed to be close to getting the 22-year-old on a non-Designated Player deal. However, when the price went into the special compensation range, not only did Portland and the Major League Soccer home office have problems with the pact, it forced the Timbers to choose: Diskerud or Diego Valeri? And we know how they chose.

I’m not sure I would have made the same choice. Let’s take it as a given Valeri’s a better player. Portland knows more about that comparison than we do, and we should take their word on it until well after March 2. There is still a certain caché to being the first to lure a young American back from Europe. I wouldn’t have been able to resist.

Again reading between the lines, it sounds like Diskerud was interested in playing for Caleb Porter, was willing to leave some of his European money on the table, but ultimately he wasn’t willing to make the kind of concessions necessary to fit into Portland’s plans.

It’s an understandable decision on both parts. Diskerud pursued an option that didn’t quite pan out, while Portland wasn’t ready to draw up a new game plan. But from the point of view from a soccer-loving Statesider, it’s hard not to feel like something slipped through our fingers.

Here’s the whole interview:

Klopp hopes for speedy solution in club, fans’ ticket-price dispute

Liverpool's fans wave flags during the English League Cup semifinal second leg soccer match between Liverpool and Stoke City at Anfield stadium in Liverpool, England, Tuesday, Jan. 26, 2016. (AP Photo/Jon Super)
AP Photo/Jon Super
Leave a comment

From his time at Borussia Dortmund, Jurgen Klopp is used to a much more positive, family-like, everyone-pulling-in-the-same-direction atmosphere at his club of employment, so the present goings-on at Liverpool understandably have the Reds’ first-year manager feeling more than a little uneasy.

[ FOLLOW: All of PST’s PL coverage ]

Saturday’s late 2-2 draw with Sunderland wasn’t the first time Liverpool fans have headed for the exit before the final whistle, leaving Klopp feeling all alone, but it was the first time the fans have departed from Anfield early in a pre-planned, organized manner (Klopp missed the game himself with appendicitis). The Anfield faithful didn’t walk out on 77 minutes due to their team’s poor performance — Liverpool were 2-0 ahead at the time — but in protest of steadily rising ticket prices, which were unveiled at $111 per game to sit in the 132-year-old stadium’s new main stand next season.

Klopp, coming from the Bundesliga, where a season ticket at clubs the size of Bayern Munich and Dortmund doesn’t cost much more than a single-game ticket at many Premier League grounds, understands the fans’ frustration. At the end of the day, though, he works for the club, which is why he just wants the whole thing settled quickly, for the sake of his squad — quotes from the BBC:

“It’s not what we want. What I know is everyone in the club has a big interest in finding a solution for this. We don’t want people to leave the stadium before the game is finished.”

An LFC TV appearance by Liverpool chief executive Ian Ayre, in which he was expected to answer fan-submitted questions, was consequently canceled on Monday due to the ongoing dispute.

West Ham want Payet to sign new contract for fear of losing him this summer

Dimitri Payet, West Ham United FC (AP Photo/Frank Augstein)
AP Photo/Frank Augstein
Leave a comment

Dimitri Payet is going to be a red-hot commodity during this summer’s transfer window, there’s no doubt about it.

[ FOLLOW: All of PST’s PL coverage ]

Given he’s currently contracted to one of the Premier League’s “smaller” clubs — in comparison to some of the giants which are bound to be interested — West Ham United, there’s a decent-to-good chance he could be wearing a different club’s shirt come August. Especially if the 28-year-old attacker shows up and shows out at this summer’s European Championship in his native France.

If I can foresee the interest in Payet, then so too can the executives at West Ham, which is why manager Slaven Bilic took to the press on Monday to convey his desire for Payet to consider signing a new, increased contract at his earliest convenience — quotes from the Guardian:

“We are moving, the club is moving, with the new stadium, with the revenue and everything. We have to move and the most important move is to keep your best players and to add some new players who are needed and Dimitri Payet is our best player — I have no problem whatsoever to say that. Of course, I would love to have him happy, long term, at the club.”

Of course West Ham want Payet to sign a new deal immediately — doing so would accomplish two things in the club’s eyes: 1) increase the likelihood he remains at the club next season, or 2) insure the club receives a higher transfer fee for the player if he leaves in the summer anyway. The more total money remaining on his West Ham contract, the more they can demand of a prospective buyer.

[ MORE: Ronaldo commits himself to Real Madrid through 2018 ]

From Payet’s side — unless he has absolutely zero desire to move to a club like Liverpool, Chelsea or Manchester United, where he’d likely be paid close to $200,000 per week — he’d be crazy to sign a new contract at this point. Not only would it make a move this summer more difficult, but a strong showing at EURO 2016 could be worth another $15,000 or $20,000 per week on a new contract with West Ham (his current contract is rumored to be close to $100,000 per week).

With as many as five seasons still remaining on his current contract (a one-year club option can be exercised at any point), and his stock perhaps at an all-time high, the next six months could hold Payet’s last chance to get really, really paid before he hits the downside of his career.

USWNT players’ union responds in USSF lawsuit

FILE - In this Sunday, July 5, 2015 file photo, the United States Women's National Team celebrates with the trophy after they beat Japan 5-2 in the FIFA Women's World Cup soccer championship in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The U.S. Soccer Federation’s original lawsuit against the union for its champion women’s national team has been sealed after the governing body realized it had disclosed the home addresses and email accounts of many players, Thursday, Feb. 4, 2016.(AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File)
AP Photo/Elaine Thompson
Leave a comment

(AP) — The union that represents the Women’s World Cup-winning American national team opposed an expedited schedule in the lawsuit filed against it by the U.S. Soccer Federation last week, insisting no collective bargaining agreement exists.

The federation sued in an attempt to establish it has a contract with the U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team Players Association that runs through this year’s Olympics until Dec. 31. The union maintains the memorandum of understanding agreed to in March 2013 can be terminated at any time.

[ FOLLOW: All of PST’s USWNT coverage ]

The USSF filed a motion Friday in U.S. District Court in Chicago asking for an expedited schedule, and the submitted opposition papers Monday that claim “facts asserted in the motion are nowhere near accurate and are hotly disputed.”

The union also maintains the USSF knew about the disagreement since July but did nothing about it.

An initial status conference is set for April 4.

Lionel Messi to undergo tests for lingering kidney problems

FC Barcelona's Lionel Messi holds the ball during a quarterfinal, second leg, Copa del Rey soccer match against Athletic Bilbao at the Camp Nou stadium in Barcelona, Spain, Wednesday, Jan. 27, 2016. (AP Photo/Manu Fernandez)
AP Photo/Manu Fernandez
Leave a comment

BARCELONA, Spain (AP) Barcelona says Lionel Messi is to undergo medical tests to assess a recurrence of kidney problems.

[ MORE: Saturday’s La Liga roundup | Barca win on Sunday

Messi missed the Club World Cup semifinal in December due to a renal colic, an abdominal ailment often related to the presence of kidney stones within renal ducts.

Barcelona says in a statement Monday that the tests to be conducted by Tuesday at the latest, are “to assess the evolution of the kidney problem he suffered last December.”

[ MORE: Champions League returns next week — KO round matchups ]

The statement says Messi will resume training with the squad on Wednesday, when Barcelona travels to Valencia for the return leg of the Copa del Rey semifinals in which it carries a 7-0 lead.