Real Madrid CF v FC Barcelona - La Liga

Here’s the other, controversial side of Saturday’s Clasico


We played it straight when telling you about another Clasico win for Real Madrid. Given the Merengues’ performance, they deserved as much. For all of Barcelona’s possession, they were never the better team. Real Madrid earned their 2-1 victory.

There were two points of controversy that deserve more attention, including one which will leave Barcelona fans feeling slighted.

Here’s how The Guardian’s Gregg Bukowski described it:

Barcelona are denied a clear penalty at the death. They have every right to feel aggrieved. Ramos clearly trips Adriano, who snakes into the penalty area and shapes to shoot. Ramos was nowhere near the ball as he dangled his left leg out and caught Adriano’s shin. Real break and the whistle blows …

Let’s accept the premise that Ramos’s foul was penalty-worthy. Most would agree. Does that mean Barcelona necessarily have a right to be “aggrieved”?

In one sense, of course. A foul is a foul, and Barcelona has a right to expect they’ll be called just like they’d expect an offside, hand ball, or dangerous play to be whistled.

But let’s not make too much out of this.

I would certainly prefer soccer not include these kind of nebulous, unfortunate situations, but when you’re preparing your team for a game, you have to account for the possibility of human error. It is a part of the sport, and if you’re leaving your team in a position to need every call to go your way, you’re occupying a compromised position. You have to enable your team to overcome these slights, and down 2-1 late at the Bernabeu, Barcelona had no margin for error.

The harsh reality is most referees don’t call potentially game-deciding penalties at the end of games. Players know this. Coaches know this. Officials even know this, just as those of us who write about and watch the game know it. You can say Barcelona should feel wronged, but not any more so than every other team that’s been in that situation.

It’s nothing special, and it’s no reason to feel particularly wronged. If Barcelona had experienced something complete unexpected – something for which they couldn’t have planned – then we’d have something to talk about. Today, however, they wanted a whistle few teams will ever get. That’s not a reason to be upset.

But perhaps that feeling contributed to another unfortunate late-match incident, once that erupted after the final whistle. Not uncommon to this rivalry, there was a confrontation after the match. Barcelona players rushed the referee, and Victor Valdés saw red.

That these players haven’t figured out a way to restrain themselves is huge indictment of the players and staffs. That it was Barcelona who seemed more aggressive after is an ironic twist. After two years of seeing a hyper-aggressive, physical Real Madrid instigate these confrontations it’s Barcelona, now on the losing end of these derbies, that’s letting their immaturity show.

Maybe isn’t not immaturity. I may be underestimating the influence of the atmosphere this rivalry creates. Perhaps these Clasicos spark unconscious, blinding rage whenever you lose. Perhaps it’s wrong for me to expect adults used to being in this environment to avoid acting like teenagers.

But it’s far more likely these players are just being ridiculous. Since the team can’t figure it out for themselves, the LFP needs to do something about it.

Sunderland confirm resignation of manager Dick Advocaat

SUNDERLAND, ENGLAND - OCTOBER 03:  Dick Advocaat manager of Sunderland looks on prior to the Barclays Premier League match between Sunderland and West Ham United at the Stadium of Light in Sunderland, United Kingdom.  (Photo by Steve Welsh/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Leave a comment

With rumors swirling of his resignation, Sunderland have confirmed this morning that Dick Advocaat has left his post as Sunderland manager with zero financial compensation despite the protests of the chairman.

Advocaat came on in March as an emergency signing, successfully saving Sunderland from relegation with a solid run of form to finish the season. The 68-year-old Dutchman pondered at length this summer if he wished to continue on, with his wife reportedly urging him to step down, but he chose to continue on with the new season after successful persuasion from the front office.

Unfortunately, things have not gone as planned, with Sunderland sitting 19th in the table, only above Newcastle on goal differential and without a single win on the season. They’ve conceded a whopping 18 goals so far this season through eight league matches.

“I have made the decision to go after only eight games as I felt it was important to give everyone time turn things around – like we did last year,” Advocaat said upon his departure. “I am thankful to the chairman for understanding my feelings and I remain on good terms with everyone at the club.

“I wish Ellis [Short], Lee [Congerton], all of the staff, players and of course the supporters, who made me feel so welcome here, the very best of luck for the rest of the season. I have some wonderful memories to take with me and I hope I will return to see everybody again in the future.”

“I am truly saddened by Dick’s decision,” chairman Ellis Short said, “but I respect him for his honesty and for doing what he feels is right for the club. He is a man of integrity and a true football person. He was hugely respectful of the club in taking this decision and he acted 100% in our best interests. It is also testament to his character that he has forgone any kind of a financial settlement, something which is very unusual in football.”

Meanwhile, the Black Cats have dipped into what is becoming a perennial cycle, making a managerial change for the fourth time in the last four seasons.

Rumors are swirling that a host of experienced Premier League managers could be up for the job, including the currently unemployed Sam Allardyce and Harry Redknapp. Other linked names include former Leicester manager Nigel Pearson and current Burnley boss Sean Dyche.

Sepp Blatter’s daughter slams media for ruining her father’s reputation

Leave a comment

Sepp Blatter’s daughter blames the media, not her father, for Sepp’s downfall as the head of FIFA and believes he will not step down until the February congress as he initially announced.

“The media has ruined his reputation,” Corinne Blatter told Swiss newspaper Blick. “Why are they picking on him? What did he do to them? … It’s not just envy. It’s hatred.”

A host of major sponsors, including Coca-Cola, McDonalds and Visa called for Blatter’s immediate resignation as president of FIFA, to which the 79-year-old swiftly rejected. This all came after Blatter was called in by Swiss authorities for questioning after the opening of an investigation surrounding corporate mismanagement charges.

“I was afraid that they now take him away in handcuffs,” Corinne said. “He told me, ‘I must be dreaming.’ A federal policeman assured me that he could after hearing home.”

Blick pressed Corinne on many issues, all of which she defender her father. She refused to comment on many that had to do with the investigation, but did give us this gem when asked how Sepp likes to spend his money.

“He buys shoes and travel bags. He has worked 40 years. His life is modest, without any extravagance. He doesn’t play golf or go sailing.”

Shoes and handbags. What an image.