Britain Soccer Champions League

Galatasaray were done wrong – Burak Yilmaz’ yellow card must be rescinded


Galatasaray were done wrong in yesterday’s Champions League quarter-final against Real Madrid.

No, they didn’t deserve to win but trigger-happy referee Svein Oddvar Moen (pictured) did leave the Turkish side in a much less enviable position than they deserved. While Moen had more than a few head-scratching incidents his decision in the 77th minute is what really chafes my bum.

Already down 3-0, Galatasaray’s Felipe Melo played a crafty ball to the top of the Madrid penalty area directly into the path of Burak Yilmaz’ diagonal run. The Turkish international collected the pass, moved to the left side of the box and squared himself to goal. Madrid defender Sergio Ramos closed Yilmaz down and launched into a tackle forcing the Gala striker to take another touch to the left. His touch appeared to let him down, the ball rolled out for a goal kick and Yilmaz went to ground in a heap of pain. Moen was having none of it and immediately showed Yilmaz the yellow card.

For Yilmaz, it was a horrible end to a horrible night. He’d hardly seen the ball up until that point and the yellow card meant he wouldn’t be participating in the second leg due to accumulation. At first glance, it looked like a clear simulation by Yilmaz, desperate to draw a penalty. Even the commentators were fooled, noting that the striker “has gone to ground much too easily.”

The problem was Yilmaz didn’t dive. Replays clearly show that Ramos mistimed his tackle, stomping hard on Yilmaz’ right foot. It wasn’t a dirty tackle but it was undoubtedly a foul and a painful one at that. Galatasaray should have been awarded a penalty, which, if converted, would have completely changed the complexion of the second leg in Istanbul on April 9. Not only would the Turks hold a massively important away goal but they would welcome Madrid “To Hell” with the influential Yilmaz leading the line. The ramifications of Moen’s oversight can’t be understated.

I hate when players dive. If a referee is clever enough to notice simulation during a match, it has to be a yellow card. Simple as that. If this standard is upheld from top to bottom throughout the game, I’m convinced that this snake tactic will be ousted from the sport. To be fair, we’ve already come a long way. Over the last few seasons referees have grown more and more confident in penalizing divers and the results have been tremendous.

Teams that were once inherently linked with diving – the Argentinas and Italys of the world – have been forced to reinvent themselves, much for the better of the team and the game. Of course, not everyone has come full circle. Clubs like Barcelona (yeah I said it, Barcelona) are still too quick to go to ground in a bid to get calls. But in general, diving in world football is quickly becoming a thing of the past. It would be hard to argue that eradicating diving from the game hasn’t helped propel it forward – especially in places like the United States where diving has always been a cardinal sin amongst soccer lovers and a source of ridicule for the passive sports fan.

But going hand-in-hand with the referee’s duty to caution players who are guilty of simulation is the burden of getting the call correct. It’s a sizable burden. And when refs fail to meet that burden governing bodies like the UEFA Control and Disciplinary Body have to get it right.

In the case of Yilmaz’ card, Galatasaray must file a complaint with the CDB to have the card rescinded so the player can be available for the second leg against Madrid. If the CDB gets it wrong, Gala then has three days to appeal the decision to the UEFA Appeals Body. This is a no-brainer for Fatih Terim’s side. Heck, I’ll file the complaint for them.

It’s just a shame that nothing can be done about that missed penalty.

Blatter, Platini both officially appeal FIFA suspension

SAINT PETERSBURG, RUSSIA - JULY 25:  FIFA President Joseph S. Blatter and UEFA President Michel Platini look on during the Team Seminar ahead of the Preliminary Draw of the 2018 FIFA World Cup at the Corinthia Hotel on July 25, 2015 in Saint Petersburg, Russia.  (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Leave a comment

Suspended FIFA executives Sepp Blatter and Michel Platini have both officially appealed their 90-day bans through various means in attempts to clear their names.

The pair have been forced to temporarily vacate their office due to an investigation by Swiss authorities into corruption charges based on a “disloyal payment” of around $2 million from Blatter to Platini in 2011.

Blatter’s appeal was lodged within FIFA on Friday, with the president’s lawyer confirming he has “requested additional proceedings before the Adjudicatory Chamber of the Ethics Committee and filed an appeal with the Appeal Committee.”

Blatter’s American lawyer Richard Cullen said he is “very hopeful” the suspension will be lifted on appeal, while his lawyer team back on Thursday argued in a statement that the FIFA Ethics Committee “based its decision [to suspend Blatter] on a misunderstanding of the actions of the attorney general in Switzerland, which has opened an investigation but brought no charge against the president.”

The New York Times obtained a copy of the appeal, in which Blatter’s lawyers demand to see the case file which the Ethics Committee reviewed upon its decision to suspend the 79-year-old. It also asks that he receive a full opportunity to argue his innocence in front of the committee; previously, he was only afforded a short interview with Swiss investigators.

Meanwhile, Platini’s appeal came through Saturday morning and is filed with the Court of Arbitration for Sport. His case has received official, legal backing from the French FA as his home nominating association for the upcoming presidential election. Using the French FA’s support, Platini can bypass the FIFA appeals system which he individually must exhaust before moving to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

CONMEBOL has also publicly supported Platini, issuing a statement that says it “does not agree” with the decision to suspend him, calling it “untimely and disproportionate” while stating, “The presumption of innocence is a fundamental right that has to be considered. Mr. Platini has not been found guilty of any charge, therefore the provisional ban jeopardizes the integrity of the electoral process to the FIFA presidency, of which Mr. Platini is a candidate.”

The FIFA Executive Committee has announced it will hold an emergency meeting on October 20 to discuss the situation. Among the topics that will be considered will be a decision on whether to postpone the February 26 presidential election.

Emerson Hyndman says he wishes to leave Fulham amid contract standoff

LONDON, ENGLAND - APRIL 28: Emerson Hyndman of Fulham celebrates after scoring the team's second goal during the FA Youth Cup Final: First Leg match between Fulham and Chelsea at Craven Cottage on April 28, 2014 in London, England. (Photo by Charlie Crowhurst/Getty Images)
Leave a comment

Emerson Hyndman is stuck in an endless circle at his home club Fulham, and the only way out he sees would be to leave.

With his contract set to expire in the upcoming summer, Fulham has been pushing hard for the 19-year-old to lock down a long-term deal as many of his teammates have done in the recent months. Unfortunately, due to reported interest from abroad from teams like Borussia Dortmund, plus others in La Liga and the Dutch Eredivisie, Hyndman has been unwilling to do so thus far.

As a result, the USMNT prospect has seen little playing time, with manager Kit Symons understandably unwilling to let him see the field while he refuses to commit his future to the club. Hyndman has just eight minutes of League Cup play to his name so far this campaign.

Hyndman blames the lack of action as the main reason why he wants to depart, telling American Soccer Now’s Brian Sciaretta that he would like to move on.

“It’s a little difficult right now,” he said. “I’ve told them in the past that I think it’s time for me to move on. There are clubs out there that are interested and that I am excited about, so it’s difficult for me right now, and I can’t see myself getting too many first-team minutes. I feel that I had a good preseason, and I thought I might get a chance, but I am really looking forward to the future more than anything.

Unfortunately, that seems a bit unfair to his club. Why would a Championship club looking to build from within give significant minutes to a player who refuses to sign a long-term deal and looks set to leave in the summer? Then he tags the lack of playing time as the reason he wants to leave. It all seems to be a never-ending cycle.

Hyndman joined the Fulham youth setup at age 15 and flourished last season, making both his club first-team debut and earning a cap with the senior national team. He is currently with the U-23 Olympic team leading the charge for Rio 2016 qualification.

There is no doubting Hyndman’s abilities on the field, but for his sake, he needs to sort out his club situation as quickly as possible to further his growth as a midfielder.