Norwich City v Borussia Monchengladbach - Pre Season Friendly

FA charge for Norwich’s Bennett after Twitter rant

Leave a comment

The FA’s disciplinary committee have been busy boys the last few days.

First they banned Luis Suaréz for 10 games, now they have issued Norwich City defender Ryan Bennett with a misconduct charge.

Bennett — who scored his first EPL goal for the Canaries in the 2-1 win over Reading at the weekend — has deleted his Twitter account after being involved in heated exchanges with opposition fans. The 23-year-old defender posted this on Twitter, “I’ll finish you in a couple of seconds” in response to taunts from Arsenal fans following their victory over Norwich on April 13.

The Norwich player then issued his anger at not being able to respond to fans in the same manner in which he was being targeted. “Officially going to delete twitter! Seems you can’t say what you want on here, public can say why they want bit seems I can’t reply!”

So it begs the question, should soccer stars still have Twitter? Of course fans across the globe love it, they get to interact with their heroes and get an insight into the lives of professional soccer players.

But should players only use it to post pictures or tweets about training and games, their lavish lifestyles and what they’ve had for breakfast? Or should they run the risk of getting in heated debates with opposition fans, or even their own fans, and be banned or fined by the governing bodies for speaking their minds via the social networking site? It is a tricky question, which will only crop up more in the years and months ahead.

Some players don’t help themselves. But the majority use it sensibly. Most EPL teams have a member of their PR or media team to explain the issues of posting on Twitter, but the players are left to their own accords. Which is the beauty of it.

Bennett’s exchange in inexcusable. Even if he didn’t mean what he sent via Twitter, in the FA’s eyes he has “breached FA Rule E3 – use of abusive and/or insulting and/or threatening words in comments posted on a Twitter account.”

But where do you draw the line? And it is a very fine one for EPL players, clubs and governing bodies to try and tackle tactfully and with the ultimate goal of still allowing freedom of speech, without players fearing a playing ban will ensue if they step out of line.

I bet the FA can’t wait for this eventful week to be over. But you know what that say… these things always come in three’s.

Ronaldo shows no sign of injury while hanging with Conor McGregor

instagram.com/cristiano/
instagram.com/cristiano/
Leave a comment

Cristiano Ronaldo may not be ready for the UEFA Super Cup, but he’s no longer limping around.

To explore the Real Madrid superstar’s Instagram is to see Ronaldo, sometimes clothed, hanging out with celebrities.

In the last couple weeks we’ve seen him with Eva Longoria, Jennifer Lopez, and now his “bro” Conor McGregor.

[ MORE: Who wins the League of Hate? ]

Wait, what?

Yeah, Ronaldo is friends with the MMA star, and showed no ill form (and no brace of any kind) in several posed photos with McGregor.

Although admittedly, McGregor’s IG game is a bit better: The Irish fighter posted a photo of himself sunning in his briefs with the caption, “I’m gonna get him on the Forbes list by next year. But I’m gonna get him on the tan by next week.”

Good luck with both, bro.

Great to see you bro!!💪🏽🔝

A photo posted by Cristiano Ronaldo (@cristiano) on Jul 24, 2016 at 3:48pm PD

Bruce pens letter to Hull fans: “Desperately wanted to make it work”

YORK, ENGLAND - JULY 23: Steve Bruce manager of  Hull City ahead of the pre-season friendly match between York City and Hull City at Bootham Cresent on July 23, 2014  in York, England. (Photo by Nigel Roddis/Getty Images)
Photo by Nigel Roddis/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Many Hull City fans didn’t want Steve Bruce to leave the club, and this open letter shows why.

After leaving the club by “mutual consent” on Friday — it was first widely reported that he quit — fans protested at Hull’s game on Monday.

[ MORE: Who wins the League of Hate? ]

Bruce may’ve had his problems with Hull’s ownership, but he certainly got his supporters’ feelings right down to the core.

From the Hull Daily Mail:

My biggest regret is having to walk away but it was a decision I had to make for the sake of the club. The last 12 months have been very tough and it felt like the right step for the club to move forward in a different direction and with someone else in charge.

I desperately wanted to make it work this summer and be a Premier League manager again but, sadly, it wasn’t to be. Nevertheless, I’ve left Hull City with some fantastic memories that I’ll always cherish, including just eight weeks ago in the Championship play-off final at Wembley.

Class from the longtime boss, and we imagine he’ll have a job very soon if he wants it.

Report: Everton to activate release clause of Stoke’s Arnautovic

LIVERPOOL, ENGLAND - DECEMBER 28: Marko Arnautovic (1st L) of Stoke City competes for the ball against Seamus Coleman (2nd L) and Gareth Barry (1st Rof Everton during the Barclays Premier League match between Everton and Stoke City at Goodison Park on December 28, 2015 in Liverpool, England.  (Photo by Dave Thompson/Getty Images)
Photo by Dave Thompson/Getty Images
1 Comment

Everton is going to activate Marko Arnautovic‘s $16 million release clause to bring the Stoke City striker to Goodison Park, according to a report out of Austria.

Stoke had been trying to sign Arnautovic to a contract extension, but the player was reportedly prepared to play out the final year of his deal.

[ MORE: Who wins the League of Hate? ]

The huge 27-year-old Austrian has been with Stoke since 2013, and broke through with 11 Premier League goals last season.

Arnautovic would give Everton support behind Romelu Lukaku, and insurance in case the Toffees do wind up selling their Belgian striker. Everton also has Arouna Kone as a potential target forward, but Oumar Niasse is expecting to leave after less than a year at Goodison Park.

Chelsea wins the League… of Hate; Bournemouth, Leicester not hated

SOUTHAMPTON, ENGLAND - FEBRUARY 27:  Diego Costa of Chelsea celebrates his team's second goal during the Barclays Premier League match between Southampton and Chelsea at St Mary's Stadium on February 27, 2016 in Southampton, England.  (Photo by Clive Rose/Getty Images)
Photo by Clive Rose/Getty Images
Leave a comment

A family of English newspapers conducted its annual survey of which teams are the most hated in the Premier League, and there’s a new champion.

Manchester United has dropped to second in the table to Chelsea in what the Manchester Evening News called the “League of Hate”.

[ MORE: Rooney’s England position not set ]

According to the MEN, 10,000 fans were quizzed on their love and hate:

A national survey asked fans of each top flight club which sides they hate, and which they love, and the west London club came out as the most disliked club overall.

United, who won the dubious accolade last year, have been revealed to be the next most reviled side.

It’s no surprise that the league’s more successful sides sit atop the table while newer PL clubs like Bournemouth and Burnley are not reviled. That said, Leicester’s dream story has them 19th. How much more success do they need to have before shooting up the hate table?

Here’s the Top Five, and all results:

1) Chelsea
2) Manchester United
3) Liverpool
4) Manchester City
5) Arsenal