Referee Webb sends off Manchester United's Rafael Da Silva during their English Premier League soccer match against Chelsea in Manchester

Sir Alex Ferguson chastises David Luiz – But what was the real reason United lost to Chelsea?

10 Comments

Chelsea’s 1-0 victory over Manchester United was a rather drab affair until the final five minutes.

With the scored deadlocked at zero, Wayne Rooney possessed the ball on the edge of the Chelsea area when Ramires tackled him, prompting a Blues counter-attack. Rooney felt he had been fouled by the Brazilian but referee Howard Webb wasn’t interested.

Chelsea drove the length of the park, the ball eventually finding Juan Mata, who unleashed a shot that knicked off of Phil Jones’ leg before dinking off the post and into the goal.

Sir Alex Ferguson was not happy. After all, this was Old Trafford. And with the Premier League title already secured, Fergie, being Fergie, wanted even more. Specifically, he announced a few weeks ago that United’s goal was to break the record for points in the season.

Webb’s failure to whistle Ramirez’ alleged foul on Rooney turned Fergie a deeper hue of violet in the cheeks. But the referee’s decision to send off Rafael da Silva two minutes later prompted straight-up outrage from the Scottish gaffer.

The incident occurred near the corner flag. Luiz received the ball on the touch-line and da Silva immediately applied tight pressure. As Luiz shielded the ball his arms were raised and elbows appeared to fly freely, although they didn’t connect with da Silva’s head. The United defender stayed tight, nudging Luiz closer to the corner flag. Luiz then turned quickly and passed the ball away as da Silva swung his right leg, hacking down the Chelsea center-back. Luiz dropped to the floor, clutching his leg seemingly in pain before flashing a cheeky smile to the Chelsea faithful in the stand.

After the match Ferguson went berserk, claiming: “The ref has been bought by the fact Luiz is rolling about.”

The United manager continued: “He [Da Silva] retaliates but Luiz quite clearly elbows him twice, then rolls about like a diving swan and that convinces the referee. He was smiling. It’s bad. What kind of professional is that? He [Da Silva] was elbowed and he retaliated. That’s what always happens, the player who retaliates always gets the bigger penalty and it was clear that Luiz elbowed him twice.

“It was rash what he [Da Silva] did, he’s a young lad and should know better but retaliation never works. I wouldn’t say it was violent conduct. The referee hasn’t even seen it, I don’t think he could see it at all. But he has gone with the fact that Luiz has rolled about on the floor and I think that convinced him it was a red card.”

While it was predictable that Ferguson would focus at least some of his post-match comments on the da Silva sending, it had absolutely no bearing on the result of the game. United didn’t lose the match because da Silva, rightly or wrongly, was sent off.

United lost the match because Ferguson’s personnel decisions.

His first major decision was to play Anders Lindegaard over David de Gea. While Lindegaard is by no means a poor keeper, there’s a good chance that the gumby stretch of de Gea would have gotten to Mata’s goal-bound shot.

Ferguson also decided to play Anderson and Tom Cleverley in the midfield, leaving the likes of Shinji Kagawa and Wayne Rooney on the bench. Rooney would eventually sub on for Anderson in the 69th minute but when the time came to take off Cleverley, Ferguson made a defensive change, bringing on Alexander Buttner in the Englishman’s place.

It’s not that Ferguson’s decision to play Lindegaard, Anderson and Cleverley was poor, but it definitely came at odds with his aforementioned goal of trying to secure the points record, especially when he dolled out his best Starting XI against Arsenal last weekend.

So what changed over the course of the last week?

Did Ferguson suddenly decide that achieving the aforementioned points record no longer mattered?

Or did he just want to stick it to Arsenal?

They’re questions that were neither asked nor addressed at the post-match conference. But the fact is, United didn’t lose to Chelsea because David Luiz rolled about “like a dying swan.” United lost because Fergie didn’t put out his best side against a very dangerous and highly motivated competitor.

 

(Video of the Luiz/da Silva incident begins at the 1 min, 51 sec mark)

Hull City promoted, but Steve Bruce still considering future

LONDON, ENGLAND - MAY 28:  Steve Bruce, manager of Hull City lifts the trophy after victory in the Sky Bet Championship Play Off Final match between Hull City and Sheffield Wednesday at Wembley Stadium on May 28, 2016 in London, England.  (Photo by Alex Livesey/Getty Images)
Photo by Alex Livesey/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Steve Bruce saw Hull City go down to the Championship, and pulled the Tigers right back up the Premier League.

Hull won promotion at the first time of asking after defeating Sheffield Wednesday 1-0 on Saturday, but Bruce wants to see stability at the KC Stadium.

[ USMNT-BOLIVIA: Recap3 things | Player ratings ]

The club remains up for sale after owner Assem Allam saw his request to change the team name to Hull Tigers denied by the English Football Association.

From the BBC:

“I’ll sit down with the owners. It’s not often you walk away from the Premier League – that’s where I want to manage,” Bruce told BBC Radio 5 live.

“But I have to be given certain assurances that we’re all moving in the right direction.

“I keep hearing too many stories that there’s a takeover imminent. We’ll see what develops,” added the 55-year-old.

The longtime Manchester United back has been around the managerial block a few times, and it’d be nice to see him stay at Hull for the long term. He’s led the Tigers into the Premier League on two occasions, and is — seriously — the seventh longest tenured manager in the Football League. He would enter the Premier League as the second-longest serving manager, to Arsene Wenger.

BREAKING: Olympiacos striker Pulido kidnapped in Mexico

DRENTHE, NETHERLANDS - JULY 29:  Alan Pulido of Olympiacos in action during the pre season friendly match between FC Twente and Olympiacos Piraeus held at Sportpark Veenoord on July 29, 2015 in New Amsterdam and Veenoord, Netherlands.  (Photo by Dean Mouhtaropoulos/Getty Images)
Photo by Dean Mouhtaropoulos/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Terrifying news out of Mexico, where 25-year-old Mexican national team striker Alan Pulido has reportedly been kidnapped in his hometown.

Pulido, 25, has four goals in six caps for El Tri and moved to Olympiacos in 2015, where he scored five goals in eight matches.

[ USMNT-BOLIVIA: Recap3 things | Player ratings ]

Various reports claim that Pulido and his girlfriend were taken after masked gunmen cut off the vehicle in which they were riding, and only released the girlfriend.

From the Associated Press:

The official says the 25-year-old player was kidnapped near his hometown of Ciudad Victoria on Sunday after leaving a party.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the case under investigation.

Klinsmann hails Zardes’ character; USMNT forward likes his first touch

COLUMBUS, OH - MARCH 29:  Gyasi Zardes #9 of the United States Men's National Team controls the ball against Guatemala during the FIFA 2018  World Cup qualifier on March 29, 2016 at MAPFRE Stadium in Columbus, Ohio. The United States defeated Guatemala 4-0.  (Photo by Jamie Sabau/Getty Images)
Photo by Jamie Sabau/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Gyasi Zardes’ remarkable rise from Cal State Bakersfield to fixture on the United States men’s national team is one of the better stories in recent team history.

The USMNT attacker nabbed his fourth and fifth international goals in Saturday night’s blowout of Bolivia, and he’s up to 25 caps since making his debut in Jan. 2015.

[ USMNT-BOLIVIA: Recap3 things | Player ratings ]

Jurgen Klinsmann deserves some credit for putting the L.A. Galaxy on the field almost religiously as Zardes works on so many facets of his game. He’s improved dramatically in positioning, runs and 1v1 battles and reportedly soaks up information like a sponge. Klinsmann loves the guy, and for good reason.

It’s also important to note that, despite his ever-present status, Zardes remains 24 and a work in progress.

From MLSSoccer.com:

“Sometimes it’s perfect, and maybe the next day it’s not so good, but it’s totally fine – because every player has his strengths and weaknesses. So as long as they keep on working on those weaknesses and getting them better and better, it’s totally fine. He’s very straight in his thought process in front of the goal. He knows exactly what he wants to do.

“You have to follow your first thought. That’s crucial. If you start to have two thoughts, then you’re going to get messed up. He was very calm, putting two goals in there, and the whole game he was involved. It’s coming along.”

Zardes’ club goal production dropped last year from roughly a goal every other game to one every three, but he’s been growing as a playmaer and this season has four goals and four assists through 11 matches.

I really like Zardes — see my post calling for his USMNT call-up in 2014 — but let me say one negative thing about his bristling at first touch questions and saying, “To be honest, me personally, I think I have a good first touch”: I’m glad he feels that way and his woes may be a bit overblown, but calling his Saturday goals first touch goals is accurate but kind of hilarious.

The criticism of his first touch, which his betrayed him on major scoring chances in each of the last two USMNT matches, has nothing to do when his first touch is directed at goal. On his brace last night, the first was a good finish where he had to work it past the keeper and the second was a plant foot shot. Both, in fact, were shots.

Those count as your first touch on the ball, but when we discuss first touch it’s about taking the ball off a pass or dribble and possessing it for a purpose. Of course he was right to shoot, but it’s cool if your eyes rolled pretty hard in reading his comments.

Koeman: Manchester United “don’t deserve a medal” for treatment of Louis van Gaal

SOUTHAMPTON, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 20:  Louis van Gaal, Manager of  Manchester United talks to Ronald Koeman, Manager of Southampton during the  Barclays Premier League match between Southampton and Manchester United at St Mary's Stadium on September 20, 2015 in Southampton, United Kingdom.  (Photo by Tony Marshall/Getty Images)
Photo by Tony Marshall/Getty Images
Leave a comment

When it comes to the firing of Louis Van Gaal, his countryman has his back.

Southampton boss Ronald Koeman doesn’t like the way Manchester United handled LVG’s fate with the team, firing him within hours of the Red Devils winning the FA Cup.

Like many, Koeman doesn’t buy that the LVG to Jose Mourinho transition happened in a week.

[ MORE: Early and (purposefully) absurd 2016-17 PL predictions ]

Given the gossip mill since Chelsea fired Mourinho in January, that’s not a hard thing to buy, and Koeman is angry that LVG was kept out of the loop. Reports claim that Van Gaal had drawn-up plans for 2016-17 with him on the day he was let go.

From Sky Sports:

“If Louis was not told about getting the sack until after the FA Cup final, then Manchester United as a club don’t deserve a medal for the way they treated him.

“If you know a little bit about the business at the highest level in football, then you know that these kind of deals are not done overnight.”

Koeman hedges his words with conditionals, but there’s little doubt what he means. Managers generally stand together when it comes to dismissals, but it’s nice to see someone stand up for LVG’s treatment (whether he deserved to be canned or not).