Unwilling to sacrifice an attacker, Schmid never gave Seattle a chance at Real Salt Lake

1 Comment

Regardless of your feelings for the game’s strategic side, in high-level professional soccer, tactics do matter. The extent to which they matter is debatable, but anybody who seeks to dismiss the influence of a good (or bad) plan need only look to last night’s game at Rio Tinto for an example of a poor plan submarining a team’s chances.

Everybody knows Real Salt Lake is going to play a 4-3-1-2 formation, so their approach shouldn’t have been difficult for Sigi Schmid plan for ahead of Seattle’s visit to Real Salt Lake. That planning was complicated by the absence of Osvaldo Alonso – Seattle’s all-league ball-winner capable of offsetting the numerical advantage RSL was bound to have in the middle. Thanks to Javi Morales and Kyle Beckerman at each end of the final third, RSL were also likely to have an edge in talent. Schmid needed to adjust.

Unfortunately, all of his adjustments seemed to downplay the importance of the midfield. Schmid chose Brad Evans and Servando Carrasco to start in the middle, leaving Seattle without a true ball-winner (let alone enough numbers to win second balls). Staying with his typical 4-4-2 formation, Schmid’s choices of Mauro Rosales and Lamar Neagle wide isolated his two-man midfield, the attack-minded players almost never coming in to help mitigate RSL’s advantages. The way Eddie Johnson and Obafemi Martins were deployed up top, there was rarely somebody to come back onto Kyle Beckerman, who was allowed free rein to control the game. Whereas it would have been wishful thinking to see a Evans-Carrasco duo competing with RSL’s diamond under normal circumstances, the lack of help from the other parts of Schmid’s set up gave his midfield little hope.

That’s how you can have a game where RSL, not playing especially well (they were fine, not great), can put up a 17-2 advantage in shots on goal. It’s how a Seattle defense who individually played well can still give up two goals. It’s how a Sounders attack that is one of the most talented in the league can go 73 minutes without a shot on goal.

Critics of this view can point to Real Salt Lake’s two goals and note a bit of luck. The first took a fortunate bounce off a wall before falling to Kyle Beckerman. The second saw Alvaro Saborio shank a shot before Robbie Findley doubled his team’s lead. How would a bulked up Seattle midfield prevented either of those?

The answer’s in the buildup. Before Beckerman’s goal, Carrasco committed the type of edge-of-the-area foul that’s to be expected when a team’s not offering sufficient resistance in midfield. It’s too easy for the opposition to get at the defense with a head of steam, often forcing defenders to commit fouls. On the second goal, Real Salt Lake cut open the midfield, were easily able to move through the defense, leaving Findley in position to benefit from a bit of luck.

By now, you’ve probably imagined the potential solutions. With Andy Rose and Shalrie Joseph on the bench, Seattle had enough midfielders to play three in the middle, moving Evans or Carrasco into a position to pounce on second balls and promote a connection to the attack. If Schmid didn’t want to switch from his favored 4-4-2 or sacrifice one of his attackers, he still needed to adjust defensively, be it by having Rosales or Neagle pinch in, Johnson or Martins fall back onto Beckerman, or both.

By failing to sacrifice an attacker (by it by selection or tactic), Seattle was left with an ironic result. Overwhelmed through the middle, the Sounders were unable to control enough of the game to use their talented attacked, leaving the team with only two shots on goal. By failing to choose between his attackers, Schmid inadvertently sacrificed all four.

If Schmid has chosen a different course, there’s no guarantee Seattle would have gotten a result at Rio Tinto. But failing to make a tough decision between his attackers, Schmid left his team’s chances on the chalkboard. Seattle were never set up to compete with RSL.

Terry: “I couldn’t care less” about 26th-minute farewell criticism

Photo by Michael Regan/Getty Images
Leave a comment

John Terry is a man who… well, let’s just say, does things his way.

[ FOLLOW: All of PST’s PL coverage ]

For instance, remember the time Chelsea won the UEFA Champions League, by beating Bayern Munich, in penalties? Remember Chelsea’s post-game celebrations, which saw Terry, who was suspended for the final at the Allianz Arena, joyously jumping around with his teammates wearing his full kit, shin guards and all?

Was it over the top and a bit silly? Sure it was, but was anyone hurt or genuinely upset by it? Of course not. On Sunday, as Terry said goodbye to the only club he’s ever known (apart from a six-game loan spell at Nottingham Forest in 2000), he toed the line between what’s acceptable and what’s outlandish. Just like in 2012, Terry caused a minor uproar, and just like in 2012 he “couldn’t care less” — quotes from the Guardian:

“I couldn’t care less, I promise you. All I care about is celebrating with my Chelsea fans. Me and them have a wonderful rapport and have done for 22 years. Nothing that people write or say can ever get in the way of that.

“If that’s the way I want to go out, that’s the way I go out because I’ve been here 22 years, I’ve won so many trophies — so if I wanted to play one minute and come off, I would have done.

“I wanted to play 26 minutes because the shirt number means a lot to me and the supporters so as long as they are happy – and I was over the moon with the reception – I promise you I could not care less.”

“It was an unbelievable send-off from the supporters to help me to celebrate 22 years at the club.

“I’m very grateful to them, and it was something I will never forget. It was so emotional after the game, I was in bits.”

There’s something to be said about the success that Chelsea have had as a club, and the way its recency leads them to feel they are perceived by the outside world. Other clubs, “bigger,” most historic clubs — Manchester United, Liverpool and Arsenal, for example — have been winning trophies pretty regularly for decades, while 70 percent of the major trophies (14 of 20) won in the club’s history have come since Roman Abramovich bought the club 14 years ago, in 2003. Chelsea is a 112-year-old football club.

[ MORE: Pogba, Mkhitaryan fire Man United to Europa League trophy ]

Chelsea’s players and fans are so clearly away of their bought-and-paid-for status, thus everything is celebrated on the grandest scale, almost as if to legitimize their accomplishments (which stand up just fine on their own two feet) and standing within the hierarchy of English football. “Contrived” (and admittedly so) is the word that comes to mind and best describes Terry’s send-off.

No one in this space is saying there’s anything wrong with that, but everyone connected to Chelsea must realize and accept that it looks silly to supporters of the aforementioned long-time giants, and they’re going to be pointed at and laughed at every time they do it.

FA Cup: Three key battles between Arsenal, Chelsea

Getty Images
Leave a comment

The FA Cup final usually brings out terrific entertainment for the fans, and this Saturday’s finale should be no different.

When Arsenal and Chelsea take the field at Wembley Stadium, it will be the last chance this season for some of the Premier League’s stars such as Eden Hazard and Diego Costa for Chelsea and Alexis Sanchez and Mezut Ozil for Arsenal to bring glory to their club.

[ MORE: Follow all the FA Cup scores here ]

The match features two teams heading in different directions. Chelsea, the Premier League champions are in the ascendency after a one-year hiatus out of European competition, while Arsenal finished outside the top-four places in the Premier League for the first time in 20 years under manager Arsene Wenger.

In addition, there’s plenty of other storylines to watch on the field, from whether it’s Costa, Sanchez and Ozil’s potential last matches with their respective teams to how Arsenal will deal without two of its three regular centerbacks they’ve used this season.

Here’s a look at three key battles on the field ahead of the FA Cup final:


Arsenal’s centerbacks vs. Diego Costa

Diego Costa may be a thorn in Chelsea’s side off the field when it comes to the constant speculation of a move away from Stamford Bridge, but on the field this season he’s been brilliant. Costa scored 20 goals in the Premier League and another goal in FA Cup action, and he contributes off the ball as well, drawing the defense in towards him while opening up space for teammates including Hazard and Willian.

Heading into Saturday, it’s unclear who on Arsenal will be tasked with marking Costa. Laurent Koscielny was issued a straight red card in Arsenal’s 3-1 win over Everton and will miss the FA Cup final due to suspension while fellow centerback Gabriel left the field on a stretcher after suffering a knee injury. In addition, Shkodran Mustafi is still recovering from a concussion and is a doubt for Saturday.

That leaves Wenger with just Per Mertesacker and Rob Holding as healthy centerbacks, which could force Wenger to revert back to his usual four-man backline from the more recent three-man backline that’s been used.

Regardless of who Arsenal put out there, expect Costa to be at his best, attempting to physically dominate his opponent and get under their skin.


Nemanja Matic and N'Golo Kante vs. Mesut Ozil and Alexis Sanchez

Arsenal are at their best when they play through the middle of the field before finding runners out wide, setting up crossing attempts into the middle or perhaps another chance to play through the lines in the center of the field.

Standing in Arsenal’s playmaking duo of Mezut Ozil and Alexis Sanchez’s way are Nemanja Matic and N’Golo Kante. Kante, as Riyad Mahrez saw last year, does so much of the dirty work defensively that he allows his teammates including Matic and Hazard to bomb forward and either create or finish goal-scoring opportunities.

Kante will have his hands full dealing with Ozil and Sanchez in midfield, and Matic may need to sit a bit deeper to cut off the passing lanes, potentially taking him out of Chelsea’s counter attack.


Eden Hazard vs. Hector Bellerin

For all the speed that Hazard possesses on the ball, there’s at least one player on Arsenal who can keep stride pace-for-pace.

With Hazard likely lining up on the left wing, Arsenal’s right wing back Hector Bellerin will likely face Hazard up one-on-one at both ends of the field, setting up a fun encounter. With Bellerin’s speed and ability to track back, he may be open to a few 40-yard springs into space down the right wing, knowing that Hazard probably won’t be in hot pursuit.

But if Bellerin doesn’t end up with the ball and there’s an Arsenal turnover, Hazard on his own or against a centerback on the left wing could be a nightmare for Arsenal to deal with.

Man United, Man City come together to support terror victims

Getty Images
Leave a comment

The Manchester derby is known as one of the world’s fiercest rivalries, but in the wake of a devastating terrorist attack this week, both sides are joining together to support the city of Manchester and victims of the attack.

Manchester United and Manchester City announced Thursday they pledged together nearly $1.3 million into the We Love Manchester community fund. The fund was set up to assist the families of the 22 people who died and 64 people who were injured in the attack.

“The barbarism of Monday evening’s attack has shocked everyone,” Manchester United executive vice chairman Ed Woodward said in a statement. “Our clubs are right at the heart of our local communities in Manchester and it is right that we present a unified response to this tragedy. The money will help of course but the work of the two clubs and their respective foundation and community scheme can build on the fantastic spirit that Mancunians have shown in the immediate aftermath.”

Folks who want to donate to the fund can visit http://www.redcross.org.uk/manchester or http://www.justgiving.com/campaigns/charity/redcross/ManchesterEmergencyFund.

[ VIDEO: Premier League highlights ]

[ FOLLOW: All of PST’s PL coverage ]

Liverpool, Leicester City headline Premier League Asia Trophy

Getty Images
Leave a comment

The Premier League is coming this summer to Hong Kong.

The territory in Southeast China will host the 2017 Premier League Asia Trophy, featuring Liverpool, Leicester City, West Bromwich Albion and Crystal Palace. The tournament will take place from July 19-22, with all games taking place at the 40,000-seat Hong Kong Stadium.

[ FOLLOW: All of PST’s PL coverage ]

“We are very excited to be returning to Hong Kong this summer for the Premier League Asia Trophy,” Premier League Executive Chairman Richard Scudamore said in a statement. “We know from previous visits that fans in Hong Kong, and across the region, are passionate supporters of our clubs.”

This summer’s edition of the biennial tournament is the first to feature four Premier League teams. In the past, an Asian All-Star XI or a local club would be the fourth team to take part. By bringing a fourth team over, the Premier League is increasing the opportunity for Premier League fans to have a chance to see more of the league’s stars up close and in person.

For Liverpool, it will be the start of a busy season that will include UEFA Champions League action for the first time since 2015.