It’s important to remember that a lack of discussion is what got us here to begin with. The blind assumption that Iker Casillas — or Saint Iker, as he’s known to Real Madrid loyalists — was beyond reproach the greatest goalkeeper in the world enhanced the shock when he was benched midway through last season. Had people, especially those who follow Real Madrid, spoke of Casillas as one of the best goalkeepers in the world (instead of the best), his minor faults would have been closer to the public mind. The debate about his value would have already been happening, if only implicitly.
But because of an exaggerated perception, his 2012-13 fall became particularly pronounced. Instead of a goalkeeper merely losing his job, Casillas’s benching was became a saint’s fall from grace. Or, for more Real Madrid fans, the unjust attack on an idol perpetrated by a pariah, José Mourinho.
It was a heightened discussion, often irrational discussion, but it id have one meaningful positive: We could finally start having meaningful conversations on the merits and drawbacks to Casillas. They’re the type of conversations we’ve been having for years around Gianluigu Buffon, Petr Cech, Manuel Neuer, yet Casillas’s image and renown left him relatively free of such evaluations. Now that Mourinho and his conflicts have moved on from the Bernabéu, we can finally start having such disucssions.
Well, we can have those discussions unless, for some reason, Saint Iker somehow manages to be re-anointed, something these comments from Vicente del Bosque in Marca serve to do. The Spain national team coach, a Real Madrid man through and through (14 years as a player; six as a coach), offered words of defense for his current number one, words that play into some of the hyperbole that surrounds Casillas.
Describing what he’s noticed of Casillas’s emotional state:
It is not easy to overcome a very difficult situation. I have many times imagined him getting up in the mornings and saying to himself “I have been with Real Madrid since I was a boy, and I can’t be compared with any other player in terms of cost and productivity, so why are there a number of people who spend all day long abusing me, insulting me?
Del Bosque’s highlighted a real problem, one that may explain Casillas’s turmoil, though there is an obvious solution. Players shouldn’t get up in the morning telling yourself things like “I can’t be compared with any other player in terms of cost and productivity.” Let’s hope Casillas has never done that, though if he has (or anybody felt the same about him), it would explain the disproportionate incredulity surrounding his benching.
Del Bosque again, on the importance of Casillas:
There are people who simply don’t realise what he means to Real Madrid, but there are many, many more who do.
I clearly don’t. I’ll admit that. However, in the abstract, if a player within a club is so valuable that he can’t be benched, we can’t have an honest dialog about his merits, nor can we move on from that dialog without resurrecting of an apocryphal legacy, the club becomes overly beholden to one man, something that should never happen. Iker Casillas is a part of Real Madrid. He doesn’t define it.
To be clear, the fact that Iker Casillas is a soccer legend at the Bernabéu is not apocryphal. He certainly is. The extent to which that legend influences our evaluation of the Casillas’s 32-year-old self is the problem.
Casillas can both be a legend and imperfect. There’s no need for Madrid loyalists like del Bosque to persist with the insistence he’s beyond reproach.