The balance between success in the Europa League and PL has been difficult for the Dane to juggle.

Swansea City manager Michael Laudrup deserves big time credit

1 Comment

Michael Laudrup deserves credit, big time credit.

After delivering Swansea City their first major trophy in the club’s 100 year history this past spring, journos across the globe (myself included) pegged him to leave the Liberty Stadium for a more prestigious throne.

It was a move he seemed destined to make.

After all, three of his previous four club managerial appointments (Getafe, Spartak Moscow, Mallorca) had been one-and-dones. Only his first managerial stint, at boyhood club Brøndby, extended beyond one season.

He moved on for a variety of reasons, but mainly because of ambition and an inability to deal with boards, chairmen and owners who didn’t give him what he wanted. The later, of course, was largely a product of the former. Michael Laudrup simply wants to win.

That was the clear objective when the Dane arrived in South Wales last summer. His influence was immediate, bringing in a collection of high value, low cost players – Jonathan de Guzman (free loan), Chico Flores (£2 million [$3m]), Michu (£2 million [$3m]), Ki Sung-Yueng (£6 million [$9m]), Pablo Hernandez (£6 million [$9m]) – who would prove pivotal to the club’s League Cup triumph and 9th place finish in the league.

It was that success that raised eyebrows amongst big clubs across the globe. “Yes, there were clubs – a couple of big ones as well – who wanted me,” Laudrup said.

Real Madrid, Paris Saint Germain, Fenerbahce and Monaco were among the superpowers reportedly interested in bringing Laudrup to the next level. Yet with the lure of managerial riches and Champions League football, Laudrup signed a one year extension in March to continue managing the Swans.

But even after that move, many believed Laudrup might still be on his way out of Swansea. So when word hit papers that Laudrup was entangled in a bitter dispute with chairman Huw Jenkins over transfer funds, rumors regarding the manager’s pending departure kicked in to overdrive.

As Swans supporters gnawed their collective fingernails, the club started making moves.

First was the decision to bring in Jose Canas from Real Betis on a free. Then the Swans brought in cover at center-back, buying Juan Amat from Espanyol for £2 million ($3m), and at attacking midfield, signing Alejandro Pozuelo from Betis for £400k ($603k).

Despite the activity, the cut-rate prices didn’t seem to suggest that Laudrup was winning his transfer fund battle over Jenkins. That began to change last week when Jenkins matched his most expensive signing from 2012-13 by dropping £6 million ($9m) on Liverpool midfielder Jonjo Shelvey.

Today, however, it became crystal clear that Laudrup had gotten his way when Swansea smashed their transfer record by agreeing to a £12 million ($18m) deal to sign Ivory Coast international Wilfried Bony from Vitesse Arnhem. Signing Bony, who was the top scorer in the Eredivisie last season having scored 31 goals in just 30 matches, is a clear statement of the Swans’ intent to compete at the highest level.

And with that, all is well in South Wales. Laudrup has his signings and the board has a manager who they don’t need to worry about resigning. “[I]t wasn’t about saying I wanted this, this and this. Or I want £18m, £21m or £24m. It was about knowing we had to strengthen our team,” Laudrup told the South Wales Echo.

So credit to both sides on working through turmoil, but especially to Laudrup for fighting off the sweet smell of a big club move when it seemed easier than not to do so.

“Yes, there were clubs – a couple of big ones as well – who wanted me,” Laudrup admitted. “But I didn’t have to speak to anyone because I want to stay here. Please, never again ask me about my future – it’s a waste of time.”

Well, then. That settles that.

Chelsea wins the League… of Hate; Bournemouth, Leicester not hated

SOUTHAMPTON, ENGLAND - FEBRUARY 27:  Diego Costa of Chelsea celebrates his team's second goal during the Barclays Premier League match between Southampton and Chelsea at St Mary's Stadium on February 27, 2016 in Southampton, England.  (Photo by Clive Rose/Getty Images)
Photo by Clive Rose/Getty Images
Leave a comment

A family of English newspapers conducted its annual survey of which teams are the most hated in the Premier League, and there’s a new champion.

Manchester United has dropped to second in the table to Chelsea in what the Manchester Evening News called the “League of Hate”.

[ MORE: Rooney’s England position not set ]

According to the MEN, 10,000 fans were quizzed on their love and hate:

A national survey asked fans of each top flight club which sides they hate, and which they love, and the west London club came out as the most disliked club overall.

United, who won the dubious accolade last year, have been revealed to be the next most reviled side.

It’s no surprise that the league’s more successful sides sit atop the table while newer PL clubs like Bournemouth and Burnley are not reviled. That said, Leicester’s dream story has them 19th. How much more success do they need to have before shooting up the hate table?

Here’s the Top Five, and all results:

1) Chelsea
2) Manchester United
3) Liverpool
4) Manchester City
5) Arsenal

Allardyce will use Rooney where he’s playing for Manchester United

BURTON-UPON-TRENT, ENGLAND - JULY 25:  Newly appointed England manager Sam Allardyce poses after a press conference at St. George's Park on July 25, 2016 in Burton-upon-Trent, England.  (Photo by Matthew Lewis/Getty Images)
Photo by Matthew Lewis/Getty Images
Leave a comment

England manager Sam Allardyce is going to choose the best players going, and play them where they’re playing for their club.

Joe Prince-Wright has a full write-up on Allardyce’s unveiling here, as the English boss says Wayne Rooney will play for his country in the same spot as his club.

[ MORE: Cresswell out four months ]

So it seems Jose Mourinho’s preference at Manchester United will help dictate where England’s leading scorer will line up.

From the BBC:

“I still think Wayne Rooney has a massive place to play in the England side,” said the 61-year-old.

“If Jose says he is not going to play him in centre midfield and he is playing up front and scoring goals for Manchester United then it would be pointless me bringing him into England and playing him in centre midfield.”

Those comments will have anti-Jurgen Klinsmann folks nodding their heads in approval. That said, Allardyce isn’t exactly going out on a limb, as Rooney is widely expected to play deeper for United with strikers like Anthony Martial, Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Marcus Rashford also around.

FIFA bans council member Niersbach in World Cup bids probe

ZURICH, SWITZERLAND - FEBRUARY 26:  FIFA Executive Committee member Wolfgang Niersbach looks on during the Extraordinary FIFA Congress at Hallenstadion on February 26, 2016 in Zurich, Switzerland.  (Photo by Matthias Hangst/Getty Images)
Photo by Matthias Hangst/Getty Images
Leave a comment

FIFA council member Wolfgang Niersbach, a member of FIFA’s ruling council, was banned from soccer for one year on Monday in the first sanction from the investigation into Germany’s 2006 World Cup bid.

FIFA’s ethics committee found Niersbach guilty of failing to report findings about possible unethical conduct and conflicts of interest during the bidding process.

Niersbach, who was a vice president of the 2006 World Cup organizing committee in charge of media and marketing, described the punishment as “inappropriate and excessive.”

[ MORE: Cresswell out four months ]

Last year, Niersbach had been considered a possible successor to UEFA President Michel Platini before resigning as president of the German soccer federation when allegations against the bid first surfaced.

Niersbach retained his elected positions on the top decision-making bodies at both FIFA and UEFA. He is the first member of the rebranded FIFA Council, which replaced the discredited executive committee in May, to be sanctioned by the ethics division.

“This decision hits me hard,” Niersbach said. “I was confident after last Thursday’s hearing in Zurich that the ethics commission would not impose a ban, but that it would follow my argument that I am only to blame for a belated report on the critical payments between the 2006 World Cup organizing committee and FIFA in 2005, of which I gradually became aware in the summer of 2015, and that it would set a different punishment.

“I acknowledged my mistake and regretted it again.”

Niersbach is consulting his lawyers about whether to appeal against his ban.

[ MORE: Does Pogba match his fee? ]

Swiss federal prosecutors, and German criminal and tax investigators, also have wider ongoing criminal cases into the 2006 World Cup – a hugely successful tournament at the time which the host nation called its “Summer Fairytale.”

The probe involves irregular seven-figure payments and contracts during the bidding process and organization of the World Cup implicating senior officials.

The main FIFA ethics case focuses on former Germany great Franz Beckenbauer, who headed the World Cup organizing team and joined the FIFA executive committee in 2007; Theo Zwanziger, who replaced Beckenbauer at FIFA in 2011; Horst Schmidt, vice president of the World Cup organizing panel; and Stefan Hans, chief financial officer for the organizers.

In February, an inquiry report commissioned by the federation tried to explain a complex trail of payments of 6.7 million euros ($7 million) and 10 million Swiss francs ($10 million) that linked Beckenbauer, then-FIFA president Sepp Blatter, FIFA powerbroker Mohamed bin Hammam of Qatar and Robert Louis-Dreyfus, the late former Adidas executive and part owner of Swiss marketing agency Infront.

The report, by law firm Freshfields, did not rule out, but could not prove, that votes were bought when Germany beat a Nelson Mandela-supported South Africa bid in a 12-11 vote of FIFA executive committee members in 2000.

West Ham loses ex-Hammer of the Year Cresswell for four months

FBL-ENG-PR-WEST HAM-NEWCASTLE
GLYN KIRK/AFP/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Aaron Cresswell was one of the stalwarts of the last two Premier League campaigns, a good crosser capable of lung-busting runs and the occasional brilliant shot.

So it’s a significant blow for West Ham United to be without him for the next four months.

[ MORE: Does Pogba match his fee? ]

Cresswell has played in 75 of the Hammers’ 76 PL matches since arriving from Ipswich Town in 2014, and was injured in a 50/50 play against Karlsruher SC this weekend.

He may not need surgery to repair the knee ligaments, but is out nonetheless.

From WHUFC.com:

Head of Medical and Sports Science Stijn Vandenbroucke explained that Cresswell had undergone a scan and will consult a specialist in central London early next week. The medical team will then take a decision whether or not the defender requires surgery.

“Whatever course of action we decide to take, Aaron faces a period of rest, followed by treatment and rehabilitation and he will be out for a period of between three and four months,” said Vandenbroucke.

Left back isn’t a position of strength for most teams, and West Ham doesn’t look to be an exception.

Vandenbroucke also issued an update on Manuel Lanzini, saying the club won’t know his status until the attacker returns from Argentina duty. Lanzini was injured with Argentina’s Olympic team while preparing for the Games in Rio.