What a joke! The FA refuses to review Fernando Torres’ face scratch on Jan Vertonghen


The English Football Association will not review Fernando Torres’ face scratch on Jan Vertonghen during Saturday’s 1-1 draw between Chelsea and Spurs, preventing them from taking further disciplinary action against the Spaniard.

The Blues striker and Spurs defender spent the better part of 51 minutes locked in a full-blooded battle before Torres lost his cool after what he believed was a dive from the Belgian.

In a reaction tailor made for someone with the nickname ‘El Niño,’ Torres grabbed hold of Vertonghen’s face and dug his nails into the Belgian’s skin. Torres was booked for the claw-job and was later sent off for a reckless challenge on the Spurs defender.

Given the violent nature of the scratching incident, many felt that FA could revisit the incident and hand Torres an additional ban to the one match after he was shown his second yellow card in the 81st minute.  On Tuesday, they announced that won’t be the case.

“One of the match officials saw the coming together of the two players, albeit not in its entirety,” an FA statement read. “In these particular circumstances, in line with the FA’s policy on when retrospective action may be taken, reviewed this summer by the game’s stakeholders, no action may be taken.”

source: Getty Images
Fernando Torres was issued his second yellow card for this challenge on Jan Vertonghen.

Torres could have been banned for up to four matches should the FA referred the video to its new independent disciplinary panel and violent conduce been found. But, as referee Mike Dean’s assistant Jake Collin saw the incident, the FA refused to review the incident.

This system permitting an independent panel of three former referees to look at incidents retrospectively and decide if charges should be brought replaces the old system where action was only taken if the referee viewed the footage and judged whether he should have sent a player off. But, in both cases if any match official saw part of the incident – even if not the full detail – then the FA cannot take further action. Which is exactly the loophole the Torres incident falls.

If this system – and the decision – sounds ridiculous that’s because it is.

The main problem is that the system allows referees to avoid handing out additional bans if they’ve seen at least part of the incident – thus the “albeit not in its entirety” line of crap. With three field referees following the play at all times, is there ever really an incident where referees won’t have seen at least a glimpse of the incident? Doubtful.

In the case of Torres and Vertonghen, the linesman (Collin) was standing just behind Torres and clearly saw the coming together of the two players. What he couldn’t see, however, was Torres’ child-like face scratch, which is precisely why the Spaniard was issued a yellow card and not a red.

The fact that the FA now refuses to review the incident based on seeing part of the tussle, is without question, asinine.

So, is Fernando Torres getting preferential treatment here?

Possibly. Outside of his puerile claw-job, Torres is not known for being a dirty player.

But you can bet that if Luis Suarez, Joey Barton, Ryan Shawcross, Cheik Tiote, Marouane Fellaini or Craig Gardner pulled this move the FA would’ve found a way to review it and assess an additional ban.

What a joke.

Sam Allardyce to open talks with Sunderland

Sam Allardyce, West Ham United FC
Leave a comment

Now that Liverpool have selected and named their new manager, it appears Sunderland are finally ready to move forward with their own managerial search. (That’s clearly a joke, because it implies Liverpool and Sunderland ever duke it out for the same managerial candidate.)

[ FOLLOW: All of PST’s PL coverage ]

Anyway, the Black Cats will have to hire someone to replace the recently-departed Dick Advocaat at some point. We all knew that, despite the fact he’s probably earned a shot at that level, Bob Bradley was never really going to be considered for the job. With that in mind, if you’re not going to endear yourself to the entire United States of America with this hire, you might as well go for the best unemployed manager who’ll actually consider your approach.

That’s what Sunderland chairman Ellis Short appears to have done, as it was reported Thursday that despite an initial reluctance from Sam Allardyce — let’s be honest, he actually was holding out hope for the Liverpool job — the 60-year-old most recently in charge of West Ham United was willing and ready to enter into negotiations with the northeastern club.

One of the major sticking points during Sunderland’s courting of Allardyce is expected to be his demand for autonomy in the transfer market as well as a sizable transfer budget to sign his own players during the January window.

[ MORE: Advocaat: Sunderland squad too thin, chairman to blame ]

Allardyce seems like the no. 1 guy you’d like to bring in to steady a capsized ship — cough Sunderland cough — in any situation. Not only does he have a successful track record in the Premier League, but he’s the kind of no-nonsense leader a club like Sunderland so desperately needs as they find themselves in yet another relegation battle just eight games into the new season.

Short hopes to have Allardyce signed, sealed and delivered when the Premier League returns to action next weekend. In that event, Allardyce’s first game in charge of Sunderland would be a trip to West Bromwich Albion. His first home fixture? Home to Tyne-Wear derby rivals Newcastle United, a club whose boisterous fanbase still holds a great deal of disdain for Big Sam. Sometimes the football gods really are looking out for us.

Statement from suspended UEFA president Michel Platini

Michel Platini, UEFA & FIFA
Leave a comment

Statement from suspended UEFA President Michel Platini:

Early this afternoon, I was informed of the FIFA ethics committee’s decision to impose on me a provisional 90-day suspension with immediate effect. That decision, which I will of course contest in the appropriate manner at the appropriate time, had already been the subject of a deliberate leak, and I gave my opinion on that earlier in the day.

I reject all of the allegations that have been made against me, which are based on mere semblances and are astonishingly vague. Indeed, the wording of those allegations merely states that a breach of the FIFA Code of Ethics “seems to have been committed” and that a decision on the substance of the matter cannot be taken immediately.

Despite the farcical nature of these events, I refuse to believe that this is a political decision taken in haste in order to taint a lifelong devotee of the game or crush my candidacy for the FIFA presidency.

I want everyone to know my state of mind: more than a sense of injustice or a desire for revenge, I am driven by a profound feeling of staunch defiance. I am more determined than ever to defend myself before the relevant judicial bodies.

I want to reiterate in the strongest possible terms that I will devote myself to ensuring that my good faith prevails. I have received numerous messages of support today from UEFA’s member associations and the other confederations encouraging me to continue my work serving football’s interests. Nothing will make me give up on that commitment.