England's manager Roy Hodgson (L) looks

English players playing fewer minutes in the Premier League: What can be done?


As if all the chatter about the lack of B-teams, a dearth in player development and whether England should convince Andan Januzaj to play for their country wasn’t enough, now data has been released showing the proportion of English players playing in the Premier League has decreased. According to a study by Opta, commissioned by the BBC, English footballers account for less than one-third of the minutes played in the country’s top division.

As a comparison, in Spain, which both lifted the most recent World Cup and took the Euro 2012 title, Spanish players play 59% of the minutes in La Liga. Germany, who placed third in FIFA’s latest rankings, has 50% of its Bundesliga minutes played by Germans.

With England still uncertain to qualify for the World Cup, news such as this only serves to increase fear that the country will continue to fall behind. With that fear comes knee-jerk reactions, ones centered on keeping players out rather than fostering growth within. Former Football Association chairman Lord Triesman believes England’s problems are getting worse, and stated, “Unless there is some sort of ratio idea that Uefa president Michel Platini has been advocating over the years, I expect that we are not going to resolve that problem.”

Perhaps the emphasis is in the wrong place. What the study doesn’t mention is how many of a country’s players are plying their trade in one of the world’s best leagues. Germany, who booked their ticket to Brazil on Friday night, has Mesut Özil at Arsenal and Mario Gómez at Fiorentina, to name just two examples. The spine of Spain hails from Real Madrid and Barcelona, but they also have David Silva at Manchester City and now rising star Thiago Alcântara at Bayern Munich.

England? With the exception of third-choice goalkeeper Fraser Forester, who stops his shots at Celtic, every single call up in the past 12 months has come from a Premier League side. The English are simply not plying their trade elsewhere. Perhaps it’s due to the cost of English players, perhaps from a desire for the players to stay at home, to play in the best league in the world. Perhaps it’s a mixture of both.

But rather than worry about the proportion of Englishmen playing in the top English league, perhaps England should fret more about their players playing in top leagues, period. Yes, it’s good for the national team if clubs develop home grown talent at quality academies. But it’s also good for the national team if players take a chance on playing outside of the British isles. When English teams compete against sides from Germany and Spain in the Champions League, they are often frustrated.

So too with international football. England may have ultimately triumphed over Montenegro on Friday night, but that was mainly due to the visitors changing their approach in the second half. The Three Lions were unable to beat Ukraine, and go into Tuesday’s match with Poland in desperate need of a win. Concern over how England will fare should they be forced into a playoff to reach Brazil reveals just how little confidence the English have in their players at this time.

Limiting the number of foreigners allowed in the top division would be an easier solution than finding ways of sending young players to other leagues, but in the long run, it will benefit neither the players nor the fans. The league will suffer as more and more talented players head to other countries. On the other hand, exposure to other styles of play, and experience gained from playing in other leagues, would do wonders for England’s talent, both with club and country. And that growth in talent will allow them to compete with the best players from other countries, naturally increasing the proportion of minutes played by Englishmen in the top division.

Surely that’s better than an artificial cap on players from outside the Home Countries, yes?

Blatter, Platini both officially appeal FIFA suspension

SAINT PETERSBURG, RUSSIA - JULY 25:  FIFA President Joseph S. Blatter and UEFA President Michel Platini look on during the Team Seminar ahead of the Preliminary Draw of the 2018 FIFA World Cup at the Corinthia Hotel on July 25, 2015 in Saint Petersburg, Russia.  (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Leave a comment

Suspended FIFA executives Sepp Blatter and Michel Platini have both officially appealed their 90-day bans through various means in attempts to clear their names.

The pair have been forced to temporarily vacate their office due to an investigation by Swiss authorities into corruption charges based on a “disloyal payment” of around $2 million from Blatter to Platini in 2011.

Blatter’s appeal was lodged within FIFA on Friday, with the president’s lawyer confirming he has “requested additional proceedings before the Adjudicatory Chamber of the Ethics Committee and filed an appeal with the Appeal Committee.”

Blatter’s American lawyer Richard Cullen said he is “very hopeful” the suspension will be lifted on appeal, while his lawyer team back on Thursday argued in a statement that the FIFA Ethics Committee “based its decision [to suspend Blatter] on a misunderstanding of the actions of the attorney general in Switzerland, which has opened an investigation but brought no charge against the president.”

The New York Times obtained a copy of the appeal, in which Blatter’s lawyers demand to see the case file which the Ethics Committee reviewed upon its decision to suspend the 79-year-old. It also asks that he receive a full opportunity to argue his innocence in front of the committee; previously, he was only afforded a short interview with Swiss investigators.

Meanwhile, Platini’s appeal came through Saturday morning and is filed with the Court of Arbitration for Sport. His case has received official, legal backing from the French FA as his home nominating association for the upcoming presidential election. Using the French FA’s support, Platini can bypass the FIFA appeals system which he individually must exhaust before moving to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

CONMEBOL has also publicly supported Platini, issuing a statement that says it “does not agree” with the decision to suspend him, calling it “untimely and disproportionate” while stating, “The presumption of innocence is a fundamental right that has to be considered. Mr. Platini has not been found guilty of any charge, therefore the provisional ban jeopardizes the integrity of the electoral process to the FIFA presidency, of which Mr. Platini is a candidate.”

The FIFA Executive Committee has announced it will hold an emergency meeting on October 20 to discuss the situation. Among the topics that will be considered will be a decision on whether to postpone the February 26 presidential election.

Emerson Hyndman says he wishes to leave Fulham amid contract standoff

LONDON, ENGLAND - APRIL 28: Emerson Hyndman of Fulham celebrates after scoring the team's second goal during the FA Youth Cup Final: First Leg match between Fulham and Chelsea at Craven Cottage on April 28, 2014 in London, England. (Photo by Charlie Crowhurst/Getty Images)
Leave a comment

Emerson Hyndman is stuck in an endless circle at his home club Fulham, and the only way out he sees would be to leave.

With his contract set to expire in the upcoming summer, Fulham has been pushing hard for the 19-year-old to lock down a long-term deal as many of his teammates have done in the recent months. Unfortunately, due to reported interest from abroad from teams like Borussia Dortmund, plus others in La Liga and the Dutch Eredivisie, Hyndman has been unwilling to do so thus far.

As a result, the USMNT prospect has seen little playing time, with manager Kit Symons understandably unwilling to let him see the field while he refuses to commit his future to the club. Hyndman has just eight minutes of League Cup play to his name so far this campaign.

Hyndman blames the lack of action as the main reason why he wants to depart, telling American Soccer Now’s Brian Sciaretta that he would like to move on.

“It’s a little difficult right now,” he said. “I’ve told them in the past that I think it’s time for me to move on. There are clubs out there that are interested and that I am excited about, so it’s difficult for me right now, and I can’t see myself getting too many first-team minutes. I feel that I had a good preseason, and I thought I might get a chance, but I am really looking forward to the future more than anything.

Unfortunately, that seems a bit unfair to his club. Why would a Championship club looking to build from within give significant minutes to a player who refuses to sign a long-term deal and looks set to leave in the summer? Then he tags the lack of playing time as the reason he wants to leave. It all seems to be a never-ending cycle.

Hyndman joined the Fulham youth setup at age 15 and flourished last season, making both his club first-team debut and earning a cap with the senior national team. He is currently with the U-23 Olympic team leading the charge for Rio 2016 qualification.

There is no doubting Hyndman’s abilities on the field, but for his sake, he needs to sort out his club situation as quickly as possible to further his growth as a midfielder.