We all know Liverpool Football Club and Owner John W. Henry is desperate to redevelop their famous Anfield home, but it seems like some flying critters could put a stop to all that before it’s even begun.
Plans for the expansion of Anfield are at an advance stage, with plans to increase the capacity to 60,000 expected to be lodged with Liverpool City Council shortly. However sightings of bats, that’s right you read that correctly, flying inside the stadium and calling the rafters high above the famous turf home, could see expansion plans take a nosedive.
Why? Because bats are a protected species and ‘must not be “adversely affected” by building work and studies will determine what can be done to accommodate bats and building work’.
A spokesman for the Bats conversation Trust had this to say.
“[Liverpool] must not harm bats’ conservation status. If it’s believed bats are or are likely to be present at Anfield, an ecologist will have to establish how bats use the site and find out which species are present before undertaking building works. And any works will have to take any bats present into account to ensure they are not adversely affected.”
So, after years of painstaking planning behind the scenes trying to get locals on board with the plans to expand Anfield rather than move to a new home in Stanley Park, could Liverpool’s plans for expansion really be hit by bat problems?
Whatever happens, it seems as though this project is destined to be drawn out and provide as much controversy as possible. Surely there has to be a way to relocate Anfield’s population of bats, whilst not harming them during an expansion?
Hang on a minute, bats… Vampires… Luis Suarez biting people at Anfield…
Klopp says Origi and Coutinho need their minutes managed, but said Sturridge feels good after normal recovery from his 70-minute return against the Irons. The English striker was Liverpool’s star in the match, and looked a cut above the Reds’ recent strike options.
As for the ticket price issue, Klopp beamed with pride over the Liverpool decision.
From the BBC:
“I think the world of football it is not easy when you are the owner of a club to prove you are interested in the club,” said Klopp.
“I have been here four-and-a-half months and I know the owners as people. They really care about the club and the interests of supporters. Hopefully it is understood for what it is: proof of their real interest in this club and all the things around this club.”
No surprise that Klopp backed the men who pay his deal, but it’d be easy enough for him to ignore the issue (though that’s hardly in his DNA).
As for Sturridge, Liverpool’s in for some goals if Tuesday is any indication.
Such is life for Karyn Forbes, member of the Trinidad and Tobago women’s national soccer team. In the above video, you’ll observe Forbes, a 24-year-old midfielder, giving away perhaps the most bizarre penalty kick you’ll ever see. You’ll have to watch for yourself to believe it.
Unfortunately for Forbes, though the whole of the ball might have crossed the whole of the end line, the referee did not blow her whistle… not until Forbes picked the ball up with her hands and carried it to her goalkeeper.
The DFL says it will be lodging an application with FIFA to take part if the pilot phase is approved by the International Football Association Board at its next annual general meeting on March 5.
The DFL says video replays could be used by a “team of impartial match officials for the purpose of avoiding any evidently incorrect decisions” and that the pilot phase would be preceded by “intensive preparations.”
Payet’s current contract was scheduled to keep him at the Premier League club through the summer of 2020, but a series of standout performances (6 goals, 4 assists so far this season, mostly during the season’s opening three months) and rumors of interest from “bigger” clubs meant tacking on another year — and plenty more cash — was the best way to keep Payet in east London for the foreseeable future. The club confirmed earlier this week that negotiations over an extension were underway.
“He’s the best player I’ve signed in 25 years,” said West Ham co-owner David Sullivan. “He’s a [$43 million] player. He’s a supreme footballer. He makes every player in our side play better. On his day, he’s world class, he’s unstoppable.”
Payet, who’s been at West Ham just eight months after signing last summer, could still depart in the summer should he finish the current season strong and/or show up and show out at the European Championship, which kicks off in June. In that event, West Ham would now bag a much heftier transfer fee than they would have done prior to the extension.