Diego Fagundez, New England Revolution

Who is Diego Fagundez – and why the young scorer won’t soon be playing for the United States

8 Comments

Anyone else get the feeling that we would be in full supporter flutter about Diego Fagundez, that the young man’s Q rating would already be through the domestic soccer roof, if he played in Seattle or New York or Los Angeles? The supporter buzz does seem amplified when it emanates from soccer’s loudest market voices, eh?

Either way, if you haven’t laid eyes on the New England Revolution scoring sensation, you really should do something about that. Bare bones bio: He’s 18, a Revolution academy product, mostly plays out wide but can certainly lean inside, who just led the Revs with 13 goals.

The “Wow” factor doubles when you consider that Fagundez didn’t take any of New England’s penalty kicks; most of the league’s leading scorers have that advantage. He is the youngest player (and the only teenager) in MLS history to score 10 goals or more in a season.

I’ve written some of this before, but the MLS playoff season serves as the perfect excuse for a reminder. (FYI, mea culpa on one PST weekend post. I said Fagundez was rarely seen in the Revolution’s 2-1 win over Sporting KC. While that’s mostly true, it was his shot that pinged around and eventually became the playoff season’s first highly controversial goal. So, my bad.)

Plus, it’s an excuse to answer the next question on everyone’s mind: Is young Fagundez, who was born in Uruguay and moved here when he was 5, a U.S. national team prospect?

The short answer is: “No … not yet.”

Fagundez recently received permanent residency status, which is the first step toward becoming a U.S. citizen. As for his soccer, he wants to play for the United States national team. So in this way, this is unlike the situations we saw with Andy Najar (Honduras) or Guiseppe Rossi (Italy) or Neven Subotic (Serbia). All of them had conflicted feelings about their national soccer identities. All eventually leaned elsewhere.

Not Fagundez, apparently. He wants his Uncle Sam to want him.

But before we get into a debate about how those other prospects were handled, and how the U.S. Soccer federation should or should not approach the Revolution’s loaded young gun, know this:

It’s a moot point. He is not a citizen and cannot become one for five years. Unless he marries, and then it’s three years.

So Fagundez, who is surely already on European clubs’ radar – and will become an even brighter blip on the radar if he scores during the ongoing MLS playoffs – would have to wait until he’s about 23 before U.S. Soccer could even extend an invitation.

It could happen that way. But that could potentially mean a whole bunch of saying “no” to Uruguay in the meantime – and those opportunities seem to be drawing nearer.

Winter on Allardyce corruption allegations: “Touch and go whether he survives”

England international soccer team manager Sam Allardyce, centre, his assistant Sammy Lee, left, and FA chief executive Martin Glenn, right, applaud during the launch event of UEFA Euro 2020 and the unveiling of the tournament brand and the London host city logo at City Hall, in London, Wednesday Sept. 21, 2016. (AP Photo/Tim Ireland)
AP Photo/Tim Ireland
Leave a comment

As details continue to unfold from the Telegraph’s sting operation that may’ve caught England manager Sam Allardyce in its grasp, the question of whether the ex-Sunderland man could be fired after just months on the job is moving to the forefront.

Allardyce, 61, is on tape talking about third party ownership of players — a big no-no for FIFA — and the words have some alleging that he is giving advice on how to buck the system.

[ MORE: Watford’s Deeney rages after loss]

Given that the manager has only overseen one match for the Three Lions and had been accused, but never charged, with accepting bribes from agents in 2006, some think he may not survive the issue.

Well-connected The Times of London writer Henry Winter says it’s possible.

Liverpool’s Jurgen Klopp pulls the rug out from armchair tacticians

Leave a comment

Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp spent time on Sky Sports’ Monday Night Football set for Burnley’s 2-0 win over Watford, and proffered some fascinating comments.

The ones that had us quite delighted were some dismissive comments aimed at people who like talk about, even lament, the Reds’ “false nines” — boiled to its bone, an advanced attacking mid that assumes the striker’s role.

[ MORE: Allardyce in hot water ]

After all, most times a 4-5-1 and a 4-1-4-1 are essentially the same thing (and perhaps dictated more by how a match plays out). And when Liverpool is using Daniel Sturridge, Roberto Firmino, or Divock Origi, it’s the player that matters as much as the formation (USMNT fans can consider how Bobby Wood and Clint Dempsey rotated around the top of Jurgen Klinsmann’s formation at the Copa America despite having a traditional given position in the Starting XI).

“To be honest, I don’t think about us having now a false nine or no nine or whatever it is. These players are all responsible for being in the opposition box in all situations there can be. “

Right. If an attack is moving ahead with just one man sitting high, that most advanced attacker is a forward. It doesn’t matter if that attacker has drifted out left on defense, or checked deeper into the formation when the other team has the ball. He’s a striker.

“A lot of people have got different views on it. Where’s the difference between 4-1-4-1 and 4-5-1, I don’t see it really.

“4-3-3, it depends on the situation you are in. For example, if you play a 4-3-3 with real wingers, like Holland played a few years ago, then it is different.”

Presumably, Klopp is speaking of the 4-3-3 employed by Louis Van Gaal at the 2014 World Cup in Brazil. Arjen Robben, Wesley Sneijder, and Robin Van Persie forced defenses to stretch wide as well as long, and that is a genuine 4-3-3. It’s much different than an average formation graphic showing three players high and three players low. The spacing of the opposition and movement of the ball match demands that!

Tactics and techniques are a lot of fun to discuss and debate, but Klopp reminded us a fact that plays out in almost every match. Most times, when the ball is kicked in anger, it’s “about Jims and Joes, not X’s and O’s” as former University at Buffalo and current Canisius College men’s basketball coach Reggie Witherspoon liked to say.

England: Allardyce in hot water after controversial Telegraph report

LONDON, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 21:  England manager Sam Allardyce and his assistant Sammy Lee listen to speakers during the UEFA EURO 2020 launch event for London at City Hall on September 21, 2016 in London, England.  (Photo by Dan Istitene/Getty Images)
Photo by Dan Istitene/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Sam Allardyce might be in a bit of trouble.

The England manager has been “caught” on tape by undercover Telegraph reporters in what’s being called a sting. Some of the banter is simply Allardyce being Allardyce — ripping on personalities he doesn’t like — and won’t affect much at all.

[ MORE: Watford’s Deeney rages after loss ]

Being outspoken isn’t a crime, after all. Other talk, though, could be quite damaging to the ex-Sunderland and Bolton boss. Allardyce reportedly flirted with getting big money to speak to a company that would be pitching third party ownership of players, which is strictly prohibited by FIFA.

From The Telegraph:

He agreed to travel to Singapore and Hong Kong as an ambassadorand explained to the “businessmen” how they could circumvent Football Association rules which prohibit third parties “owning” players.

Unbeknown to Allardyce, the businessmen were undercover reporters and he was being filmed as part of a 10-month Telegraph investigation that separately unearthed widespread evidence of bribery and corruption in British football.

The article is a part of an investigation the Telegraph claims will cause many problems for some big names in England over the coming days.

It could all come to nothing, though reports below show the Football Association will look into the Telegraph’s claims.

Watford’s Deeney raging after loss: “We got bullied to a man”

Leave a comment

Watford’s spirits have gone from the penthouse to outhouse in barely a week.

The Hornets hammered Manchester United last week only to look listless against Burnley at Turf Moor on Monday.

[ MATCH RECAP: Burnley 2-0 Watford ]

Outshone under the bright lights of Monday Night Football, Watford captain Troy Deeney is, in a word, angry.

From the BBC:

“Poor. I’ll have to watch my words or I’ll get in trouble. We got bullied to a man, Burnley stuck to their gameplan, fair play to them.

“We lost 2-0 on TV, we got run over and both goals could have been avoided. I’m very disappointed. You set high standards and if you don’t match them people will ask questions.”

With Bournemouth, Middlesbrough, Swansea City, and Hull City next on its Premier League docket, this is not a time for Watford to accept inconsistency.

To a man.