Outside of Southern California, there are two kinds of MLS fans when it comes to how they regard Chivas USA: those who have wondered why MLS doesn’t just cut bait and move this laggard, and those who will get around to wondering about it sooner or later.
Remember, not so long ago, when some MLS well-wishers got so giddy about the possibility of David Beckham purchasing Chivas USA – although it turned out to be no possibility at all? Yes, wishful thinking prevails.
Welp, about that long-hoped for move or sale or shut-down or whatever: it’s not happening.
I write this periodically, that MLS is committed to making this thing work out. The “why” remains something of a mystery. After all, the entire Chivas USA thing has been a drag on the league for years, mediocre in its best moments and a complete embarrassment during others.
But for two years now, MLS commissioner Don Garber or other league higher-ups have steadfastly delivered the same message: the ONLY option is working to make Chivas USA better, to create more relevancy in the local market, to keep prodding for independent stadium solutions and to keep hoping the club gets itself sorted out from a competitive standpoint.
Consider the message delivered yet again, this time via Q&A with ESPNFC writer Jeff Carlisle. Garber told Carlisle that there is, in fact, a plan. But he doesn’t want to talk about the plan – which makes you believe this alleged plan is about like my personal plan to corner the lucrative soybean market. That is to say, we’re still working on it.
What Garber told Carlisle when asked directly if there was any scenario that would see the club move or fold?
Absolutely not. There is no chance that club is going to be contracted, and no chance that club is being moved.
That certainly sounds definitive, doesn’t it?
Then again, expect the questions to keep coming. Probably around the first of March, as the next crowd of 4,000 or so files into the StubHub Center to watch the facility’s renter tenant.