Club Atletico de Madrid v Barcelona - UEFA Champions League Quarter Final

UEFA rule Atletico’s on-loan Chelsea ‘keeper can play against the Blues in UCL semis


Ahead of the UEFA Champions League semifinal draw on Friday, UEFA released a statement reminding clubs of the ‘integrity of competition’.

That was in relation to Chelsea’s on-loan goalkeeper Thibaut Courtois, who is currently playing for Atletico Madrid who the Blues could’ve faced in the final four of the UCL… And, as fate would have it, that’s exactly how it’s turned out.

(MORE: UCL semifinal draw – European giants clash in final four)

Chelsea reportedly had a clause inserted into Courtois’ loan deal that stated Atletico must pay them $8.3 million if the clubs were ever to meet in the Champions League and the Madrid club wanted to play the 21-year-old Belgian ‘keeper against his parent club.

According to the following statement from UEFA the talented young goalkeeper, who has spent the past three seasons as a regular for Diego Simeone’s side, is able to play against Chelsea in the upcoming UCL semifinal and the clause would violate the ‘ sporting integrity’ of the competition.

In response to media reports referring to the situation of Club Atlético de Madrid goalkeeper Thibaut Courtois, UEFA would like to reiterate its position. The integrity of sporting competition is a fundamental principle for UEFA.

Both the UEFA Champions League and the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations contain clear provisions which strictly forbid any club to exert, or attempt to exert, any influence whatsoever over the players that another club may (or may not) field in a match. It follows that any provision in a private contract between clubs which might function in such a way as to influence who a club fields in a match is null, void and unenforceable so far as UEFA is concerned.

Furthermore, any attempt to enforce such a provision would be a clear violation of both the UEFA Champions League and the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations and would therefore be sanctioned accordingly.

(MORE: Atletico face $8.3 million price to play starting GK if drawn with Chelsea)

This is certainly a tricky area to navigate, as in the past other players have been caught up in these loan confusions. Usually  in the Premier League, a player will have a clause in his loan deal that states he cannot play against his parent team however with Chelsea putting a monetary fund on Courtios head, it has all got a bit messy. Plus there are no such restrictions involving players loan players playing against their parent club in the UCL.

During the 2013-14 Champions League we have already had s similar situation. When Celtic played Elfsborg in the qualifying rounds, their on-loan striker Mo Bangura was free to play against the Hoops but they felt he shouldn’t be playing against his parent club and expected Bangura to sit it out. However he was free to play, and indeed played against his parent club for the Swedish side.

It is thought Atletico will not play Courtis, both for the financial reasons of playing over $4 million per game, and due to the fact that they want to keep one of the best young goalkeepers in the game at Atletico on loan next season. So, it is in Atleti’s interests to not upset Chelsea, otherwise they could lose their start ‘keeper.

A complex and unique situation will be the main stroyline unfolding as Chelsea and Atletico Madrid prepare to square up.

Ferguson still being asked about Moyes: “We chose a good football man”

David Moyes Alex Ferguson
AP Photo/Martin Rickett/PA
Leave a comment

In some ways absence makes the heart grow fonder, but it seems Sir Alex Ferguson‘s life after Manchester United has been filled with second guessing.

Whether the sales of Paul Pogba and Gerard Pique or the appointment of David Moyes, “Fergie” apparently can’t rest on his title-winning laurels.

[ MORE: Tax evasion charges dropped against Messi, but not his father ]

One thing that seems to bug him more than anything, though, is the idea that he hand-picked David Moyes to be his successor, and should be responsible for his failings.

In a new documentary, Ferguson both defends the appointment of Moyes and explains the process behind his choice.

From the BBC:

“I don’t think we made a mistake at all. I think we chose a good football man,” Ferguson says. “Unfortunately it didn’t work for David.

“Jose Mourinho was going back to Chelsea, Carlo Ancelotti was going to Real Madrid, Jurgen Klopp had signed a contract with Dortmund, Louis Van Gaal was staying with Holland for the World Cup.”

The article also makes another key point, according to Ferguson: the manager claims he only gave United a few months notice that he’d be stepping down. That certainly didn’t provide a lot of lead time to secure a big boss.

What do you make it of it? If your answer is, “When can we stop talking about Moyes and United?” I tend to be with you, but it’s a talking point.

Tax evasion charges against Messi dropped; Case vs father continues

FILE - In this Sept. 27, 2013 file photo, Barcelona F.C. star Lionel Messi, left, arrives at a court to answer questions in a tax fraud case in Gava, near Barcelona, Spain. Barcelona prosecutors are calling for the arrest of Messi's father in a tax fraud case. Prosecutors have cleared Messi of wrongdoing but are seeking an 18-month prison sentence for his father, Jorge Horacio Messi, for allegedly defrauding Spain's tax office of 4 million euros ($4.5 million) in unpaid taxes from 2007-09. (AP Photo/Emilio Morenatti, File)
AP Photo/Emilio Morenatti
Leave a comment

Lionel Messi will not face charges that he and his father defrauded the government in millions of unpaid taxes, though his father is not so lucky.

Messi’s father, Jorge, could face 18 months in jail and an approximate $2.25 million fine despite a voluntary payment of $5.5 million in 2013 to “correct” the missed taxes.

[ WATCH: Hilarious spoof pegs Messi, Ronaldo as “Friends” ]

The Barcleona star had plead ignorance to the charges, something that failed to impress prosecutors. But, it apparently worked out in his favor on Tuesday.

From the BBC:

Prosecutors allege that Jorge avoiding paying tax on his son’s earnings by using offshore companies in Belize and Uruguay between 2007 and 2009.

Messi’s lawyers argued that the player had “never devoted a minute of his life to reading, studying or analysing” the contracts, El Pais newspaper reported.