Rimando or Guzan, who you got?

Brad Guzan or Nick Rimando – Who will replace Tim Howard for USA?

8 Comments

After Brad Guzan and Nick Rimando play 45 minutes each for the USA against the Czech Republic on Wednesday, it seems as though the battle to replace Tim Howard over the next 12 months isn’t as straightforward as we thought.

Guzan was, and probably still is, the favorite to replace Howard long-term, but Rimando’s second half display against the Czechs was nothing short of sensational and reminded us all of his sublime, if unconventional, talent.

[RELATED: Player ratings, USA vs. Czech Rep.]

Howard’s year-long sabbatical has thrust this discussion into the limelight, as fans of U.S. soccer have long been clambering for Guzan to get more of a chance in goal. How many times have you heard “too bad for Guzan, he has Timmy Howard ahead of him” when dsicussing the USA’s squad? The answer: a lot.

However, Rimando was never in that discussion. Until now.

The Real Salt Lake ‘keeper has suffered from being labelled ‘too short’ and ‘too small to be a goalkeeper’ by many out there. But the man who won the Gold Cup with the USA in 2013, and has been pretty much ever present in Klinsmann’s squad since he took over as boss, is now proving just how good he is. A stunning stat was also pulled out by Paul Carr from ESPN, as Rimando has never lost when playing for the U.S. The Californian ‘keeper has a 13-0-2 record in his 15 caps for the Stars and Stripes. So, he’s a bit of a lucky charm, too, if you believe in superstition.

[RELATED: USA beat Czech Republic 1-0 in Prague]

One of the biggest travesties in Major League Soccer is that Rimando has never won the Goalkeeper of the Year award during his 14-year stint in the league. For Miami Fusion, D.C. United and RSL, he has always been reliable and pulls out highlight-reel saves on a weekly basis. Just ask the locals who watch him at the Rio Tinto. They will not have been surprised by the three stunning stops Rimando made late in the game as the Czechs piled on the  pressure. Rimando made two sprawling saves (watch the highlight video above to see how good they were) with his feet and a few more crucial blocks to keep the home side at bay and persevere the USA’s 1-0 lead. Rimando seems to be grasping this fight for the starters spot and is eager to push Guzan all the way for it.

source: AP
Rimando or Guzan, who you got?

[RELATED: Howard’s sabbatical provides chance for Guzan, Johnson, Hamid]

As for Guzan, his rise in the Premier League with Aston Villa has been a sensational story as the former Chivas USA stopper was released by the Villans in 2012. Without a club, Guzan was quickly signed back up by new Villa manager Paul Lambert and has been the number one ever since. He was Villa’s Player of the Year last season and has already recorded two clean sheets from three matches this campaign.

Guzan didn’t have much to do in his first half display against the Czech Republic on Wednesday, but we know his capabilities. He is still the favorite to replace Howard and many believe that at the age of 29, Guzan should be the preferred choice in goal for the U.S. when the 2018 World Cup rolls around. Rimando will be 39 during the World Cup in four years time, so perhaps that gives Guzan the edge too.

Between now and next year when Howard returns, Guzan has a real battle on his hands just to win the starting spot ahead of Rimando. We all know the U.S. is traditionally a powerhouse in producing goalkeepers, but the strength of it’s second and three string ‘keepers is something else when you consider MLSers Bill Hamid and Sean Johnson are also lined up behind Guzan and Rimando.

Whoever gets the nod to replace Howard permanently over the next 12 months, the U.S. won’t have to worry about the goalkeeping position for quite some time.

That’s a huge plus, even if it provides Klisnmann with one heck of a headache.

Premier League Preview: Middlesbrough vs. Hull City

Leave a comment
  • Teams have only met twice in PL before
  • Boro have 6 draws from 13 games
  • Hull have won just once in last 11 PL games

Middlesbrough host Hull City at the Riverside Stadium on Monday (Watch live, 3 p.m. ET on NBCSN and online via NBCSports.com) in what can already be described as a six-pointer in the Premier League between two newly-promoted teams.

WATCH LIVE ONLINE HERE

Boro has won just once at home in the Premier League this season and sits on 12 points, while Hull has only won once on the road and Mike Phelan‘s side has just one victory in their last 11 games as the Tigers sit in the relegation zone on 11 points.

In team news Hull’s Sam Clucas and Ryan Mason are available but Abel Hernandez and Shaun Maloney are both struggling with injuries and striker Dieumerci Mbokani is suspended. As for Boro, Daniel Ayala could return but George Friend is still out.

What they’re saying

Aitor Karanka on Boro’s bad luck: “I think for example against Stoke we could have won and against Watford and Crystal Palace we didn’t deserve to lose. But the truth is we have 12 points and one day we will not deserve to win and we will win. When you have been working in the Championship for two and a half years and know how tough every single game is, having the opportunity to work against the best teams in the world is amazing, but we know we have to improve every single day.”

Hull boss Phelan on the story so far: “We can talk about spirit and determination but we can apply that by taking the games on and getting in front. That still requires the same sort of detail but you can see the players are grafting. They are learning and observing things. It’s possibly taken us this far to understand where we’re at and what league we’re in.”

Prediction

This will be a tight encounter and it may not be pretty. Both teams need the points to drag themselves away from an increasingly congested relegation battle. 1-o to ‘Boro.

Blatter loses appeal against six-year ban

ZURICH, SWITZERLAND - JULY 20: Comedian Simon Brodkin (not pictured) throws cash at FIFA President Joseph S. Blatter during a press conference at the Extraordinary FIFA Executive Committee Meeting at the FIFA headquarters on July 20, 2015 in Zurich, Switzerland. (Photo by Philipp Schmidli/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Leave a comment

Sepp Blatter should get the message this time.

[ MORE: Zlatan defends kick ]

It was announced on Monday that the former president of FIFA from 1998 until 2015 has lost his appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) over a six-year ban from all soccer related activity.

After being found guilty of making an illegal payment of $1.65 million to the former head of UEFA, and close friend, Michel Platini, in 2011, the Swiss official has already had his initial eight-year ban reduced to six and Platini had his eight-year ban reduced to four years.

However, Blatter has reached the end game and at the age of 80, it is unlikely he will ever hold any position in world soccer ever again.

Plus, Blatter has the small matter of still being investigated by the Swiss authorities who are looking into FIFA’s records, and the FBI continues to arrest and charge officials within world soccer’s governing body due to allegations of widespread corruption over the past two decades.

Things could get much worse than a six-year ban for Blatter.

In a statement released by CAS, they revealed why Blatter’s appealed had been turned down:

“The appeal of Joseph S. Blatter has been dismissed. As a consequence, the decision rendered by the FIFA Appeal Committee (FIFA AC) on 16 February 2016 remains in force and Mr Blatter remains banned from taking part in any football-related activity at national and international level for six years as from 8 October 2015 and must pay a fine of 50,000 Swiss francs.

“By approving a payment of £1.3m to Mr Platini in 2011 for the balance of work carried out under the alleged oral agreement, Mr Blatter breached the FIFA Code of Ethics since the payment amounted to an undue gift as it had no contractual basis.

“The Panel further found that Mr Blatter unlawfully awarded contributions to Mr Platini under the FIFA Executive Committee retirement scheme which also amounted to an undue gift.”

Aguero banned four games, Fernandinho gets three

Leave a comment

The English FA have confirmed that Manchester City duo Sergio Aguero and Fernandinho will be banned for four and three games respectively after being sent off late in the 3-1 defeat against Chelsea last weekend.

[ MORE: 3 things we learned ]

Aguero, 28, lunged in on David Luiz and was shown a straight red card for the tackle (if you can even call it that) and Fernandinho, 31, was sent off in the ensuing melee as he pushed Cesc Fabregas repeatedly and grabbed him around the throat.

In the case of Aguero, he would have already been banned for three games but his punishment has been extended by an extra game due to his suspended three-game ban which he received for elbowing West Ham’s Winston Reid back in August.

As for Fernandinho, he has been handed the standard three-game ban for being sent off for violent conduct.

Pep Guardiola‘s City ended the game with nine-men against Chelsea and looked frustrated after blowing a 1-0 half time lead as they lost 3-1 against the Premier League leaders.

Without Aguero and Fernandinho, their upcoming games against Leicester, Watford and Arsenal are now looking very difficult, plus Nicolas Otamendi will be unavailable against Leicester this Saturday (Watch live, 12:30 p.m. ET on NBC and online via NBCSports.com) due to picking up his fifth yellow card of the season.

With regards to the melee at the end of Chelsea’s win at City, it is expected the FA may fine both teams for their actions and Fabregas could also be implicated as some camera angles appeared to show him striking Fernandinho in the face first.

Let’s wait and see.

As for City, injuries and suspension are adding up and they’re now four points behind leaders Chelsea, plus they’ll have to do without their leading score Aguero who has 10 of their 30 goals in the Premier League.

A chance has now arrived for City’s only other central striker as 20-year-old Kelechi Iheanacho will likely be given the opportunity to lead the line, or if not Nolito or Kevin De Bruyne may operate as the highest player in a false nine formation.

Ibrahimovic denies deliberately kicking Coleman in the head

LIVERPOOL, ENGLAND - DECEMBER 04:  Zlatan Ibrahimovic of Manchester United tangles with Seamus Coleman of Everton as they battle for the ball during the Premier League match between Everton and Manchester United at Goodison Park on December 4, 2016 in Liverpool, England.  (Photo by Laurence Griffiths/Getty Images)
Getty Images
1 Comment

Zlatan Ibrahimovic was involved in an incident in the second half of Manchester United’s 1-1 draw at Everton on Sunday which have raised a few eyebrows.

[ VIDEO: Rojo red card? ]

As Zlatan and Everton defender Seamus Coleman tussled for the ball, the duo fell down and the Manchester United striker eventually fell on top of Coleman.

However, as he went to get up he kicked Coleman in the head and the Toffees’ right back was later subbed out with an apparent head injury.

Speaking to MUTV after the game, Ibrahimovic was asked about the incident.

The response of the 35-year-old striker — who scored once again for the Red Devils to take his tally this season to 12 — to the incident was not exactly the perfect PR answer…

“It was a physical game, they played hard,” Ibrahimovic explained. “I heard one of the commentators say I kicked someone in the head on purpose, but it was a 50/50 duel and he pulled me down. Trust me if I want to kick someone in the head, I know how to kick someone in the head and make him fall asleep. That is the only thing I have to say.”

It is unlikely that Zlatan will be facing any further action from the FA for the kick out but I look at that incident and say he was lucky to escape with a petulant act. He knew where Coleman was and took a chance on leaving his boot in and letting the Everton defender know he was there.

Sure, it may have been accidental but anybody who has played the game knows you can get away with certain things and when a master of the “dark arts” such as Zlatan is involved, I find it tough to believe he didn’t know what he was doing.

It was unnecessary from Zlatan and the act seemed to steam from the frustration of playing up top on his own against a bruising Everton defense.