After things boiled over during several angry clashes between Hull City and Manchester City at the KC Stadium on Saturday, some disturbing images emanated from Man City’s 2-0 away win.
No more so than an alternate TV camera angle, which caught Hull midfielder George Boyd spitting towards City’s ‘keeper Joe Hart, after the pair had been involved in an altercation when Boyd seemed to take a tumble in the box despite there not being any contact from the on-rushing Hart.
Boyd has now been charged by the English Football Association, after breaching FA Rule E1 [a], plain old misconduct to you and I, but Hart will not be reprimanded for his part in the ugly scenes that saw the two players in question square up.
The FA had the following to say in a statement released on Tuesday.
“Hull City’s George Boyd has been charged by The FA following his side’s game against Manchester City on 15 March 2014. The charge is in relation to an alleged breach of FA Rule E1 [a] in that in or around the 68th minute of the game Boyd spat at Manchester City’s Joe Hart.”
Although since the alleged “spitting” incident, Hart has come out and stated he didn’t feel like he had been spat at and didn’t notice it. I was at the game high in the stands on Saturday, so could only see what looked like an alleged headbutt from Hart on Boyd, which was later dismissed as a coming together and I certainly didn’t see Boyd spit at Hart. Although when you watch the video evidence, it is clear that he did just that. Behavior like that is disgusting and needs to be stamped out of the game, as we mentioned in PL Playback.
The FA revealed that referee Lee Mason missed the incident but the panel, which includes three former referees, charged Boyd following compelling video evidence. This season the retrospective bans have come into the PL, as the panel take into account all incidents that the match officials do not spot during the game, where previously no such panel was in place.
“Under a new pilot project in Premier League matches this season, if an incident has not been seen by the match officials, a three-man panel of former elite referees will be asked by The FA to review it and advise what, if any action, they believe the match referee should have taken had it been witnessed at the time. For an FA charge to follow, all three panel members must agree it is a sending-off offense. In this instance, the panel were of the unanimous decision that it was an act of misconduct.”