Jack Warner

AP Photo/Craig Ruttle

World Cup bribes, death threats: Corrupt world of FIFA


Hour after hour in a New York City courtroom, the schemes to corrupt world soccer are spilling out.

The millions of dollars in “inducements” to secure contracts to televise matches. The bribes sought by FIFA executives with the power to determine World Cup hosts. The death threats for cooperating with investigators.

It took the intervention of the U.S. Department of Justice to disrupt years of embezzlement by officials who abused roles in the global soccer governing body, FIFA, to enjoy a gilded lifestyle. Two years after a sprawling investigation of FIFA led to waves of arrests that shook soccer, the trial of three men is underway and about to enter its second week.

[ MORE: Pulis sacked | What’s next for WBA? ]

Though the trial in Brooklyn is dealing with corruption allegations before new FIFA leaders emerged in 2016, officials still prominent in soccer are not untouched by the evidence already heard in court – particularly relating to the awarding of the 2022 World Cup to Qatar.

Here is a look at the talking points from the first week of the trial:


The three men on trial pleaded not guilty to charges they took part in a 24-year scheme involving at least $150 million in bribes paid by marketing firms in exchange for lucrative broadcasting and hosting rights for prestigious tournaments:

– Jose Maria Marin (Brazil): Former president of the Brazilian soccer federation arrested in a raid on a hotel in Zurich in May 2015.

– Juan Angel Napout (Paraguay): Swept up in a second wave of arrests at the same hotel in Zurich in December 2015. As president of South American soccer confederation CONMEBOL, Napout was portraying himself as an agent of reform who could clean up FIFA before being indicted.

– Manuel Burga (Peru): Former Peruvian soccer federation president detained along with Napout at the Baur au Lac hotel close to FIFA’s Swiss headquarters.


More than 40 other officials, business executives and entities have been charged. Many have pleaded guilty, hoping to receive reduced sentences, including Alejandro Burzaco, the former head of the Argentine sports marketing company Torneos y Competencias, who is a star witness for the prosecution.


No decision has proved more toxic for FIFA than the 2010 vote that handed the 2022 World Cup to Qatar. The bid has been stained by suspicion of wrongdoing for years, although FIFA has been unable to uncover evidence it says would warrant stripping the Middle East of its first World Cup.

Usually quick to defend their integrity, the Qataris have been silent on the fresh claims of vote-buying divulged in court.

According to Burzaco, three South Americans were among 22 FIFA executive committee voters who took million-dollar bribes to support Qatar, which beat out the United States in the final round of voting in December 2010.

[ MORE: Busy week for PL big boys ]

A rule-breaking voting pact between Qatar and the Spain-Portugal campaign in the 2018 bidding – twice investigated by FIFA’s ethics committee but unproven – was given fresh credence in court by Burzaco, a trusted associate to the late former FIFA senior vice president Julio Grondona, to whom he channeled bribes worth millions.

Grondona was the most influential of South America’s trio of FIFA voters, and would surely have been indicted but for his death in July 2014. The other two voters, Ricardo Teixeira of Brazil and Nicolas Leoz of Paraguay, were indicted by U.S. prosecutors in 2015 but have avoided extradition from their home countries.

Burzaco testified to conversations and incidents with Grondona in 2011, including a confrontation about media reports of bid bribes with Qatari officials at the five-star Copacabana Palace Hotel in Rio de Janeiro.

An angry Grondona, Burzaco testified, later complained he got into “all these mess and scandal for only” $1.5 million while two others had fooled him and got $75 million. Those two, the court was told, were Teixeira and Sandro Rosell, a former Nike executive and then-president of Spanish club Barcelona who had business ties to Qatar.

FIFA has not directly commented on last week’s courtroom allegations, inevitably waiting for the conclusion of the trial. Qatar’s hosting of the World Cup has come under fresh attack in recent weeks by neighboring countries that have severed diplomatic ties with the emirate.


While the probity of the World Cup vote has been thrust back into the spotlight, much of the evidence so far relates to how officials sprayed illegal cash payments to secure broadcasting rights in the Americas.

Leading broadcasters have been implicated by Burzaco’s evidence about the trail of bribes, including Fox Sports (United States), Televisa (Mexico) and TV Globo (Brazil), which deny wrongdoing.


The most dramatic moment in the opening week of the trial saw Burga accused of threatening Burzaco by making a slashing motion on his neck as the witness testified. Burga claimed he was scratching his throat but still had his bail conditions tightened. Burzaco earlier disclosed he became the target of death threats after it emerged he was cooperating with authorities.


A former Argentine government official, Jorge Delhon, killed himself hours after the court was told he took millions in bribes in exchange for handing out television rights.

Jorge Delhon, a lawyer who worked in the administration of former Argentina President Cristina Fernandez, dealt with the now-defunct government program Futbol para Todos (Football for All), which broadcast local soccer matches on public TV. Burzaco implicated Delhon in taking bribes.


The close ties in South America among lawmakers, judges and soccer leaders are becoming clearer.

In a series of WhatsApp messages detailed in court Wednesday, Napout revealed his links to the current state president of Paraguay, Horacio Cartes.

Napout passed on to Burzaco a request from Cartes’ private office to buy eight tickets for Argentina’s game against Iran at the 2014 World Cup. Around that time, Napout also noted CONMEBOL had been in a legal case with a businessman and that Cartes “resolved the entire trial and did it all because of me.”

Cartes also advised Napout to “stay close” to Grondona of Argentina to fulfil his ambition to lead CONMEBOL, the WhatsApp messages revealed.

When Argentina reached the semifinals, Napout asked Burzaco to get four tickets for Paraguay’s attorney general to buy. In a WhatsApp message, Napout tells Burzaco, “we have a trial over there. There are two judges mad because I refused” to get tickets.


The desire by FIFA to characterize the trial as dealing with officials long banished from world soccer is made harder when officials currently influential in the game are mentioned in court.

FIFA’s current finance committee chairman, Alejandro Dominguez, was referred to during the trial on Wednesday as “not a very successful businessman (who) will probably request” a bribe.

Burzaco, the prosecution’s star witness, said he was told this about Dominguez by Napout in early 2015. Napout is a Paraguayan like Dominguez, and his predecessor as CONMEBOL leader.

Under current FIFA President Gianni Infantino, Dominguez is a key ally in Zurich as one of FIFA’s eight vice presidents and was rewarded with being made chairman of the finance panel.

Among many soccer officials whose photographs Burzaco was asked by prosecutors to identify on Tuesday were Sunil Gulati, the most influential American at FIFA, and Nasser Al-Khelaifi, the Qatari who heads French soccer club Paris Saint-Germain and broadcaster beIN Sports. Al-Khelaifi is under criminal investigation in Switzerland for suspected bribery linked to FIFA awarding beIN broadcast rights to the 2026 and 2030 World Cups.

The U.S. has not accused Gulati or Al-Khelaifi of any offenses.


Several soccer officials indicted in 2015 are absent from court as they fight extradition to the United States:

– Jack Warner (Trinidad and Tobago): Charged in May 2015, four years after quitting as a FIFA vice president to avoid sanctions in the bribery case connected to a presidential election. Later banned for life by FIFA for misconduct during the 2018-2022 World Cup bidding process.

– Marco Polo del Nero (Brazil): Despite being charged with corruption, remains president of the Brazilian federation and met with FIFA’s Infantino during the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics. Del Nero fled Zurich in May 2015 when FIFA colleagues were arrested, quit the executive committee after missing meetings and was then indicted in the U.S. in December 2015.

– Nicolas Leoz (Paraguay): President of CONMEBOL from 1986 to 2013, when he resigned for receiving $130,000 in payments from a former FIFA marketing partner. Wanted in the U.S. on charges of receiving millions of dollars in bribes linked to marketing and television contracts, Leoz’s extradition was finally approved by a judge in Paraguay last week just as the FIFA trial was getting underway in Brooklyn.

– Ricardo Teixeira (Brazil): A former son-in-law of Joao Havelange, FIFA’s president in 1974-98, Teixeira quit as Brazilian federation head and a FIFA executive committee member in 2012 as corruption allegations mounted.

Status of FIFA cases: https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/file/799016/download

More AP FIFA coverage: http://www.apnews.com/tag/FIFA

Ex-FIFA official Jack Warner says USMNT loss “happiest day of my life”

Getty Images

It’s evident that many people within CONCACAF don’t have a strong relationship with United States and its national team.

Count Jack Warner as one of those people.

[ MORE: Growing sense of entitlement in U.S. soccer culture must stop ]

The former FIFA executive and vice president of CONCACAF, who was arrested in 2015 on corruption and fraud charges by U.S. federal prosecutors, has made his opinion quite clear regarding the USMNT’s exclusion from next summer’s World Cup.

Hint: he’s from Trinidad & Tobago.

“I have not been in better spirits. This is the happiest day of my life”, Warner told the Trinidad Express. “It (the win) couldn’t have given me great joy.”

Warner — who is clearly still bitter about he and others within the ranks of FIFA being brought up on charges — didn’t mince words about his feelings on the U.S.

“They have used their Government to help to dismember FIFA in a way that is unimaginable. And last night on the field of play Trinidad and Tobago reduced them to their knees” he said.

[ MORE: Which managers should replace Arena with USMNT? ]

As far as the former executive is concerned, it “is the beginning of the end for U.S. football.”

“They will continue to undermine (the World Cup in) Qatar for 2022, but they will not succeed. As far as I am concerned this is the beginning of the end for U.S. football”, he said. “Nobody in CONCACAF likes the US.”

FIFA admits to World Cup bribery, demands money from U.S. government

Photo by Michael Steele/Getty Images

Gianni Infantino-led FIFA is taking its reputation fight in a different direction, according to an Associated Press report.

After months and months of disgraced president Sepp Blatter protesting FIFA’s innocence and claiming an inability to monitor its confederations, the organization is angry, acknowledging wrongs, and seeking recompense.

[ MORE: Quotes from the FIFA release admitting bribery ]

In a 22-page claim filed with the United States Attorney’s Office, FIFA admits to that bribes were a part of awarding World Cups. It also wants part of the money the U.S. is collecting from guilty officials.

From the Associated Press:

FIFA claims it is the victim of corrupt individuals, despite widespread criticism that bribe-taking was embedded in its culture in the presidencies of Joao Havelange and Sepp Blatter, who was forced from office after 17 years by the current scandal.

FIFA’s grab for a share of the money sets up a battle with two of its regional confederations — CONMEBOL, the South American confederation, and CONCACAF, the body running soccer in North America. It was officials and competitions from those regions that were most involved in the corruption crisis.

It also signals a change in strategy for FIFA, after months of senior officials distancing Zurich from the scandal, instead blaming confederations which are beyond its control.

Now it’s important to note that the more than $190 million in damages FIFA is looking to reclaim is relatively small potatoes compared to the $4 billion hauled in as a result of the 2014 World Cup.

It’s even asking for money it spent on officials like Chuck Blazer, Jack Warner and Jeffrey Webb, claiming they took money that was supposed to be allocated to development and used it on personal desires.


We’re in a tricky space with FIFA. There are many who would like to believe a new direction is capable under Infantino despite his allegiance to embattled ex-UEFA president Michel Platini.

[ MORE: Vieira says NYCFC job not a stepping stone to Europe ]

So is FIFA largely making a stand and statement against its former administration, or simply trying to get money from a U.S. government that has ratcheted up FIFA’s infamy levels? Time will tell.

Growing scrutiny over FIFA TV rights deal involving Blatter, Warner

Leave a comment

Details emerging from a Swiss broadcaster claim that current FIFA president Sepp Blatter and disgraced former vice president Jack Warner were involved in a scandal over TV rights.

[ MORE: Rooney to miss United’s UCL clash ]

Swiss outlet SRF published a FIFA contract signed by Blatter in 2005 which showed that the Warner-led Caribbean Football Union had purchased the rights for a combined $600,000.

The rights were then re-sold through a company in his family name to a Jamaica-based broadcaster for a sum believed to be in the region of $20 million.

So you’re probably thinking ‘so what, we all know Warner is corrupt, what’s the big deal?’

Well, after Warner left FIFA following another corruption scandal in 2011 he claimed that FIFA let him control World Cup rights on the cheap in exchange for helping Blatter win presidential elections. This document released by SRF certainly backs up Warner’s numerous claims (which comedian John Oliver has made fun of on numerous occasions) that he has a “tsunami of evidence” against Blatter and numerous members of FIFA’s Executive Committee.

[ MORE: Mourinho in foul-mouthed tirade after defeat ]

Warner was one of the nine former or current FIFA officials indicted by the U.S. in May for alleged corruption involving leading FIFA officials and business executives.

However, Blatter, who has led FIFA for 17 years but will stand down in February of next year once a new head of world soccer is elected, has not yet been indicted in either the U.S. or Swiss invesitgations into alleged corruption.

Is this the piece of evidence that implicates Blatter?

On Monday, U.S. attorney general Loretta Lynch gave a press conference in Zurich alongside her Swiss counterpart Michael Lauber and Lynch said she “anticipates being able to bring additional charges against individuals and entities” as the investigation continues to spread across several continents.

U.S. Soccer secretary general grilled by Congress on knowledge of FIFA scandal


An ongoing hearing at U.S. Congress on the governance and integrity of international soccer aired live Wednesday afternoon on CSPAN, and it’s fair to say it was pretty uncomfortable (Watch it now, or start from the beginning on CSPAN here).

Senators Richard Blumenthal, Jerry Moran, Amy Klobuchar, and Steve Danes took turns asking questions of U.S. Soccer CEO/Secretary General Dan Flynn.

Those queries dealt with the American federation’s knowledge of the FIFA scandal, what it’s done to stop it, and even American corporations sponsoring FIFA and the difference in money between men’s vs. women’s soccer.

After British reporter Andrew Jennings opened by taking some colorful shots at FIFA, and wondering why U.S. Soccer isn’t stepping up to stop the “dirty slimebags at FIFA,” Flynn went under microscope.

[ MORE: All the latest on Sepp Blatter & FIFA ]

Flynn pointed out that FIFA was run in such a manner that U.S. Soccer had to politically pick their battles in order to protect the country’s investment in the sport and competitions. He also rightly pointed out several ways in which the U.S. has taken the lead in progressing FIFA toward equality and cleaner operations.

Without getting into the politically-worded questions of the senators — like those involving “Seep” Blatter and “FIFE-A” — here are some important quotes and recaps of what Flynn’s responses.

On if U.S. Soccer was aware of FIFA wrongdoing: “I nor anyone I work with has not brought anything to my attention, cold-hard facts, or anyone in my organization”

On Sepp Blatter and Jack Warner’s wrongdoingFlynn said their activites were “private, individual transactions” that needed help from the FBI for four years to bring to light. Regional sponsorship and broadcast rights “had nothing to do with U.S. Soccer”

To what extent he thought there was something amiss: “There were moments I would describe that if I had a level of discomfort, I would not participate or remove myself. If there was cold facts, I would’ve brought that to the attention of appropriate people”

On what he’d do differently; “I wouldn’t say that we would do it differently. Our focus has been.. we’re one of 209 national associations. We have really, at the end of the day, to find a way to participate in a manner that” would facilitate their growth.

On what he was told if he would stand up to Chuck Blazer: There was concern that if he brought stuff to his attention, “I’d feel discomfort in other ways”.