Martin Atkinson

Getty Images

Referee officials explain VAR decision on Rashford goal

2 Comments

Refereeing officials in England have explained the decision not to have referee Martin Atkinson review the buildup to the Marcus Rashford first-half goal against Liverpool on Sunday, instead allowing the goal to stand without a further check.

According to a statement released by the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) explains the decision not to review the incident and stick with Atkinson’s call on the field.

In the buildup to Rashford’s goal, Victor Lindelof picked Divock Origi‘s pocket to begin the move, but many believed there was enough contact for a foul to negate the play. The referees, however, are apparently wary of opening up every single call to review, instead looking to leave the technology for the most egregious mistakes.

“Firstly, the on-field referee didn’t think it was a foul and VAR checked/decided that it wasn’t a clear and obvious error to not award the foul,” the PGMOL said to Sky Sports after the match. “Secondly, VAR isn’t re-refereeing matches – there is contact but VAR was comfortable it wasn’t enough to disallow the goal.”

The “clear and obvious error” mantra has become household lexicon since the introduction of VAR, and looking at the play again, the PGMOL interpretation is likely correct. There’s not enough clear contact to Origi for the call to be a blatant mistake by Atkinson. Jurgen Klopp wasn’t happy about the decision to let the play stand, but he’ll have to accept the decision and move on as Liverpool failed to win for the first time this season.

Fulham nabs first clean sheet of season in draw at Newcastle

Leave a comment
  • Fulham’s 1st clean sheet of season
  • NUFC without shot on target
  • Three penalty calls unheard by Atkinson

Newcastle United couldn’t find a way past creaky Fulham, something no team has failed to do this season, as the Magpies drew the Cottagers 0-0 at St. James’ Park on Saturday.

Referee Martin Atkinson was the star of the show, turning down three penalty kick shouts: Two for handballs and another when Salomon Rondon was brought down in the box.

The Magpies now have 17 points and sit in 15th place, five points clear of the drop zone. Fulham earned its 10th point and remains in 20th.

[ MORE: Watch full PL match replays ]

Newcastle provided some chances for Fulham, but the most dangerous moment came courtesy the Magpies attack.

Jamaal Lascelles headed a free kick back across goal, with Fulham’s Dennis Odoi clearing the danger of a bounding ball through the six.

There was a scary incident in the 32nd minute, as Sergio Rico‘s two-handed clearing attempt made solid connection with Alfie Mawson‘s header. Both Rico and Newcastle’s Salomon Rondon called for medical attention as Mawson appeared to have been knocked cold for a moment.

There were shouts for a penalty when unheeded when Matt Ritchie saw his shot blocked into a Fulham defender’s arm.

The danger was limited in the second half, with Paul Dummett popping a header over the goal in the 75th. And Kenedy‘s shouts for a penalty when pulled by Joe Bryan went unrealized by Martin Atkinson.

Bryan hit a left-footed shot wide of the goal in the 79th, and Aleksandar Mitrovic twice-threatened Newcastle in the final five minutes. The Cottagers were shouting for a penalty when the second effort was blocked by a mess of Newcastle defenders.

[ MORE: Latest Premier League standings ]

[ MORE: Full lineups, stats, box score ]

Hughes still fuming at call, thinks Atkinson should be suspended

Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Stoke City manager Mark Hughes is still angry with a call from midweek, and rightly so.

His Potters lost 3-0 to Liverpool, but Hughes and many others believe it could’ve been much different had referee Martin Atkinson sent off Simon Mignolet for taking down Mame Biram Diouf.

Atkinson clearly saw the play, which earned Mignolet a yellow card despite being the last man back. The rulebook allows for the foul to not be a sending off if the foul was an accident.

[ MORE: JPW’s PL predictions | TV, stream schedule for the weekend ]

It wasn’t an accident:

He had to, which means Atkinson had to send him off. Mistake.

And now Hughes, certainly someone whose playing history would make the enjoyment of a result versus Liverpool extra special, wonders why Atkinson isn’t suspended in Mignolet’s place.

From the BBC:

“I don’t see why he should be refereeing this weekend,” he added. “My feelings reflect everybody else’s view: the referees who reviewed it since and everybody in the stadium, apart from one. Those are the decisions that frustrate me as a manager – and other managers.”

Fair? I think so.

Enough is enough: The Premier League needs to expand officiating personnel

5 Comments

This weekend was abysmal. This weekend was ridiculous. This weekend, quite frankly, was a circus.

When Rebecca Lowe, Robbie Mustoe, and Robbie Earle are forced to drum on about 18 different penalty decisions following exciting, top-four battles with intricate matchups and fascinating tactical clashes, the game of soccer has devolved into a farcical joke that panders to the lowest common denominator. Truth is, things have been careening towards this inevitable end all season long.

It’s clear to everyone that with a new age of technology has brought about a new age of accountability for officiating, and thus the standard of refereeing has reached the point where one person is no longer capable of doing the job. It’s just not possible. With immediate television replay, hundreds of camera angles, and countless new gadgets of analytical technology, it’s possible to perform open-heart surgery on a referee’s 90-minute performance. But the officials don’t have those tools at their disposal, and to hold them to the same standard is ridiculous.

This Premier League season has been marred by countless decisions that may appear in person to be a difficult decision, but for television viewers who benefit from endless replays and enhanced camera zoom, are clearly incorrect. And yet here we sit, completely ignoring a monstrous problem hoping that things will change so long as we ignore it.

I’m sure you’ve heard the definition of insanity. The elephant in this room has gone insane.

Jose Mourinho may be annoying, but he’s right (to an extent). There’s no “campaign” against Chelsea, they’ve just happened to catch the brunt of what has been a horrific year for refereeing. Don’t listen to Mike Riley, the PGMOL is either delusional, waging a losing PR war, or both. Every weekend it gets worse, with clear decisions proving mind-bogglingly impossible for

The use of technology in the middle of games is out of the question. Nobody wants to stop the flow of a game for officials to look at instant replay. It’s just not feasible, and it’s just not practical.

The answer to our problems is to add referees. The fact that we still ask one lone official to cover an entire soccer pitch is quite frankly ridiculous. Basketball uses three officials to cover a much smaller court. Football uses anywhere from five to eight. Yet in soccer, we’re still stuck with one, plus whatever the linesmen feel like adding, which sometimes isn’t much. Here’s where the linesman was on the potential Simon Mignolet handball today:

source:

He’s so far behind the play, there’s no good angle to make an accurate call. And people want to tell us extra officials wouldn’t help? How is the linesman that far back? Because he’s trying to concentrate on 800 things at one time.

Look, officiating is an impossible task. Asking humans to be inherently flawless is a losing battle, always has been a losing battle, and always will be a losing battle. So why are we setting the best in the world up to fail, and then publicly humiliating them when they do on a weekly basis? Isn’t this ludicrous? We’ll never get a perfectly officiated game. What we can do is be reasonable.

The Premier League happens to be one of, if not the most visible soccer league in the entire world. English referees are at the top of the game. Martin Atkinson is easily one of the top referees in the entire game, and yet he looked utterly lost this weekend in the process of essentially handing Burnley a point against Chelsea.

Don’t think it’s that bad? Let me help you. This was called offsides. Jan Vertonghen was called offsides on this. In his own half. And everyone on the officiating staff was cool with it.

source:

So let’s please help these poor souls out. Sure, there would be a feeling-out period of time which would be weird. It would be awkward. The referees would have to get used to working together rather than working on their own. The players would need to adapt to where they should expect calls to come from. But why are we so opposed to change when it clearly would serve the game better?

Here’s my best attempt at a workable system. If you feel you have a better one, by all means let’s hear it. This is an open forum, a positive discussion to better the game.

  • It would be a combination of the basketball and football refereeing systems. Your head official remains in the center of the pitch. He and only he can issue cards, and he would preside over all official discussions. His main responsibility would be the center of the pitch.
  • There would be one official assigned to each penalty area. They would be positioned next to one of the goal posts standing out of play. They would be allowed to whistle any fouls in or out of the penalty area they see, but their primary responsibility would be to watch the penalty area. For any foul they believe to be bookable offenses, they would consult the head official who would be instructed to trust his coworkers unless he is 100% certain he must overrule their judgement – same as in the NFL. Penalties are almost always game-changing calls, why are we asking referees standing on the midline to suddenly follow a long ball forward, and then make a call when 30 yards behind?
  • The linesmen would stay in their usual areas, and could make foul calls near the touchline, but their main duties would be to monitor offside calls. With the added officials in each final third, their responsibilities to call fouls would be alleviated, allowing them to focus on making the hardest call in all of sports.

Is this really too much to ask? It’s not, and it works. Does adding a pair of referees really cause so much chaos that we still have yet to even make such a proposal? The mere fact that a proposition such as this feels rebellious itself is an issue. Unfortunately, this probably would be met by heavy opposition at the higher levels at first. But why? It only took 140 characters for a smart person to sum it up:

Officiating is hard. One wrong call can not only change a game completely but also overshadows the other 99 the referee got right. One out of 100 isn’t too bad, right? Wrong, when that call means Nemanja Matic is sent off instead of Ashley Barnes. Would Martin Atkinson have been in better position to see that ghastly tackle had his responsibility in the final thirds been lifted? Would a penalty-area official have seen Joe Allen chop down Filip Djrucic? Probably. Nay, most likely.

Case in point: the Brazilian Serie A uses a system very similar to this, and it works. In a game last year down the stretch, with Palmeiras looking to avoid relegation, they earned a crucial penalty for a clear handball in the box. Despite standing right next to the incident, the referee didn’t give the decision for whatever reason, but with an additional official standing next to a goal post, the penalty was given, and Palmeiras earned a point. Watch at 2:00 in this highlight package:

We will never get a perfect system, and yet we continually expect one. So what’s wrong with getting as close as possible? Officials will always get decisions wrong, but enough is enough. Let’s stop spending week in and week out bashing those brave enough to embark on an officiating career, and instead let’s extend them an olive branch. Everyone wins. Yes, even Chelsea.