Soccer Specific Stadium

Revolution owner Kraft says Boston stadium still the endgame, idea progressing


Jonathan Kraft would love to create an atmosphere at New England Revolution matches that more closely resembles those in Portland or Seattle, and says the way to do it to get out of Foxboro and closer to Boston.

Downtown Boston would be idea, but Kraft isn’t pushing it. In fact, he’s being very careful what he reveals about the club’s plans at all regarding a new soccer specific stadium. New England has been burned on some potential downtown developments in the past, and their owner doesn’t want to jinx it.

[ MLS: Breaking down the final four playoff teams ]

His quotes all make sense. Gillette Stadium is a giant facility ideal for the National Football League games the Patriots play eight times or more a year. Kraft told a Boston radio station that a new home is coming.


“(The Revs) belong in a city with public transportation,” he continued, “where new Americans and the 20-, 30- and 40-year-olds who played the game and live in and around urban areas want to go to it. And it’s a different kind of vibe than a suburban football stadium has.”

“It’s something we’ve been working on for a while,” he said, “and we’ve come very close with a couple of situations over the past half dozen years and they didn’t happen. Because of that we’re just going to stay quiet until we have something.”

“So hopefully we’ll be able to do it and then create the special atmosphere that exists in many other venues around the league.”

A downtown Boston stadium would also be a boon for potential USMNT matches and the NWSL’s Boston Breakers. There are plenty of reasons for the Revolution to want to make this happen, but finding real estate will remain the tricky part (as we’ve seen with NYCFC’s struggles in New York). What say you, Revs fans? Foxboro fine by you?

U.S. Soccer budging on qualifiers in Portland, Seattle


Sports Illustrated’s Grant Wahl released these little nuggets last night on his Twitter feed, updates which could influence which venues get next year’s five U.S. Men’s National Team World Cup qualifiers:

[tweet align=’center’]

[tweet align=’center’]

Even with the caution implied by the second tweet, this is good news for Portland and Seattle. At least, it’s progress. Whereas before it was thought CenturyLink and Jeld-Wen fields were long shots to get any of The Hex’s games, now it seems U.S. Soccer is willing to be flexible in order to get final round qualifying matches in two highly desirable venues.

Seattle’s virtues are obvious. True, it’s a big football stadium in a day and age when Soccer Specific Stadium is becoming dogma, but consider the upside. It’s a huge football stadium, meaning we could see around 70,000 people backing the U.S. for a meaningful match.

And unlike other places that can draw similar crowds, Seattle’s is likely to be heavily pro-U.S. That’s something you couldn’t say in Los Angeles or Dallas. Even New York’s crowds tend to include a large number of non-USMNT supporters. When was the last time the national team played in front of a supportive crowd that large?

source: Getty ImagesPortland’s virtues lie on the other end of the spectrum, but with the charged atmosphere Columbus’s Crew Stadium was able to generate for a recent qualifier, U.S. Soccer seems interested in pursuing similar venues – locations which may not sell tons of tickets but will generate an imposing, bandbox atmosphere.

That’s Portland. Jeld-Wen can’t hold much more than 20,000 people, but it might have best atmosphere in Major League Soccer. The full voice of the field’s crowded north end would give the U.S. the type of unique setting that proves problematic for teams not used to a venue.

There seem to be few drawbacks to trying to get Portland and Seattle in the rotation. Travel is often cited as a deterrent, but in instances where the U.S. is plays the first of a two qualifier set on the road, the extra distance from Europe is a non-issue.

Ultimately, this game with Portland and Seattle has to stop. We’ve heard the reasons why U.S. Soccer avoids the venues, but the reasons seem thin compared to the sacrifice of leaving two potentially strong home field advantages out of the rotation (and two large fan bases out of the loop).

And sometimes, it all feels like a game of chicken. Who will flinch first? Each side seems to think they have some leverage. U.S. Soccer makes the final decisions and are trying to use that power, but Portland and Seattle know they offer enough distinct virtues to hold firm on some basic issues. Until now, both sides seemed to be holding out.

So while the idea of qualifiers in the northwest is exciting, the big news to glean from Wahl’s reporting is some movement in that stalemate – an apparent compromise. U.S. Soccer is willing to play on something that isn’t permanent grass while Portland and Seattle have to bring in the sod.

It’s good news, even if the debate itself is a bit of a farce.

More on the farce of the fake stuff later on the blog.